Nerman Fatic vs Antonio Voljavec Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 10:23 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs A. Voljavec

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Voljavec
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Antonio Voljavec winning 0. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Antonio Voljavec was at the M15 Bol, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fatic | 1 |
| Voljavec | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Bol(10-22-25)
N. Fatic vs A. Voljavec H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $73,995 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.58% (403-285) | Career Total W/L | 45.76% (27-32) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Fatic vs A. Voljavec Match Preview:
- When analyzing second serve effectiveness over the last six months, Nerman Fatic demonstrates superiority with a 44.59% success rate, compared to Antonio Voljavec's 38.94%. Could this indicate Fatic's stronger serve reliability? Likely, yes.
- Regarding return game prowess, Voljavec slightly edges out Fatic on opponents' second serve returns, winning 44.88% of points whereas Fatic claims 44.35%. Is this enough to impact the match outcome significantly? Potentially, given its close nature.
- First serve return success rates are slightly in Voljavec's favor at 29.98%, compared to Fatic's 28.21%. Does this slight edge provide a significant advantage? It contributes to a nuanced edge for Voljavec.
- In terms of handling pressure, Fatic excels in break points, saving 52.48%, surpassing Voljavec's 48.09%. Could this be decisive during crucial match situations? It's a strong possibility.
- Fatic boasts an impressive 76.92% win rate over the past year, a sharp contrast to Voljavec's 50.00%. Does this suggest a higher general competition level from Fatic? Definitely.
- Both players have their best performances on clay, each with a winning rate of 61%. Is the surface preference a game-changer here? It levels the playing field slightly where surface familiarity is concerned.
- Fatic's career has involved higher level tournaments such as Challengers ITF, with a strong win ratio of 66.67%, compared to Voljavec's participation predominantly in lower-tier Futures events with 51.28% success. Does tournament level exposure indicate a more competitive edge for Fatic? Certainly.
- Fatic has been up against lower-ranked players, with an average of 344.71, suggesting potentially less challenging competitions compared to Voljavec facing an average rank of 161.63.
- In deciding sets, Nerman Fatic demonstrates remarkable resilience with an 89% win rate, significantly higher than Voljavec's 40%. Does this resilience in critical situations favor Fatic as a potential winner? Strongly indicative of his tenacity and edge in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the players' stats gives a comprehensive picture of each player's strengths and weaknesses. Nerman Fatic exhibits a notable advantage in areas critical to match success, such as second serve performance and handling break points under pressure.
While both players perform well on clay, Fatic's history of competing at higher-level tournaments and his impressive overall win-loss record over the past year further emphasizes his competitive edge.
Additionally, if the match progresses to a deciding set, Fatic’s significantly higher win rate in such scenarios strongly supports his potential victory in this encounter.
Considering these factors, Nerman Fatic is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match against Antonio Voljavec.
Nerman Fatic vs Antonio Voljavec Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Fatic vs A. Voljavec H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:19:16 | Average Match Time | 1:19:16 |
| 75% (40/53) | 1st Serve % | 64% (36/56) |
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (18/36) |
| 69% (9/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 31% (4/13) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (28/56) | Return Points Win % | 32% (17/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
A. Voljavec Recent Matches Played

N. Fatic vs A. Voljavec Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.58% (403/285) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.76% (27/32) |
| 57.59% (888/654) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.62% (62/71) |
| 53.06% (7565/6693) | Games Win/Loss | 49.68% (613/621) |
| 51.19% (43/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.00% (341/218) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.76% (27/32) |
| 44.19% (19/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 1562 | Aces Total | 55 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1504 | Total Double Faults | 60 |
| 1:19:50 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 509.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 178.9 |
| 66% (23639/35555) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1157/1934) |
| 65% (15475/23639) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (732/1157) |
| 48% (5721/11916) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (332/777) |
| 47% (1959/4195) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (79/187) |
| 43% (15522/35911) | Return Points Win % | 39% (737/1885) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.15% (118/104) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 63.24% (277/161) | Futures W/L | 46.55% (27/31) |
| 60% (394/660) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (27/58) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (79/155) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 54% (102/188) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (7/14) |
| 88% (393/347) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (25/23) |
| 11% (393/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (25/2) |
| 19% (295/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (34/4) |