Nerman Fatic vs Alessandro Giannessi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Giannessi analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Alessandro Giannessi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.76% of points on his second serve, while Giannessi has won 46.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Giannessi has won 47.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.08% and 28.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 56.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Giannessi has saved 59.47% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Giannessi winning 38.98% (W/L 23/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Giannessi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 393/ 320), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Giannessi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42% of matches (W/L 21/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Fatic winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Fatic winning 4 and Giannessi winning 3. The last match between Fatic and Giannessi was at the Perugia Challenger, 07-06-2022, First, Clay with Alessandro Giannessi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Giannessi have played a deciding set 2 times, with Fatic winning 2 times and Giannessi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 2, and Giannessi 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.17 while Giannessi has played against players with an average rank of 315.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Giannessi has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Giannessi has converted 33.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 1 Giannessi
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
303
Rank
84
High
33
Age
L
Plays
10
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
57% (339-252)
Career Total W/L
53% (449-405)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
22% (4-14)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$463,191
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nerman Fatic | Alessandro Giannessi |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
Games Won | 43 | 41 |
Aces (Total) | 17 | 11 |
DFs (Total) | 13 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 2:15:1 | 2:15:1 |
1st Serve % | 69% (186/268) | 68% (191/279) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (121/186) | 59% (113/191) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (41/82) | 57% (50/88) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (12/25) | 46% (12/26) |
Return Points W% | 42% (116/279) | 40% (106/268) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 0-0 ret. |
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Nerman Fatic
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
43
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
6-7(6) 6-3 7-5 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
110)
15
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
117
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
7-6(4) 5-7 7-6(6) |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
75%
(
93 of
124)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
129)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
48%
(
60 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
62 of
129)
126
Total Points Won
127
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Alessandro Giannessi |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 22% (4/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 28% (11/29) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (150/179) | 42% (147/205) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 31% (4/9) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.23 |
Aces Total | 70 | 39 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.37 |
DFs Total | 33 | 63 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:7 | 1:22:3 |
Avg Opp Rank | 343.87 | 223.28 |
1st Serve % | 62% (574/926) | 63% (658/1041) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (393/574) | 61% (403/658) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/352) | 46% (175/383) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (27/81) | 31% (27/86) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (360/982) | 34% (340/992) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/3) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 29% (4/10) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 25% (4/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 50% (3/6) |
1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 60% (5/3) |
1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 40% (5/2) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 8% (13/1) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Alessandro Giannessi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
9
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Aidan Mayo
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
41%
(
42 of
102)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
5
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
47%
(
28 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Vasek Pospisil
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
6
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
7
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Evan Furness
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(7) ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Fabrizio Karol Pio
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Timofey Skatov
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Matteo Martineau
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Mathias Bourgue
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more