Nathan Trouve vs Ji Sung Nam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Nov at 04:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Trouve vs J. Sung Nam

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

KOR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Trouve 0 - 1 Nam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nathan Trouve winning 0 and Ji Sung Nam winning 2. The last match between Ji Sung Nam and Nathan Trouve was at the Yokohama Challenger, 16-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Trouve | 0 |
| Nam | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Yokohama Challenger(11-16-25)
N. Trouve vs J. S. Nam H2H Profile
N. Trouve vs J. S. Nam Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Nathan Trouve at 43.35% points won, slightly outperforming Ji Sung Nam's 41.47%. Can this marginal lead impact the match outcome? Possibly, as it's closely tied to prediction accuracy.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Ji Sung Nam leads with 47.27%, compared to Trouve's 43.09%, suggesting Nam's stronger return game might give him an edge in this matchup.
- Nathan Trouve has a better first serve return rate, winning 31.75% of points against 27.85% for Ji Sung Nam. Will this benefit Trouve in controlling serves?
- Under pressure, Ji Sung Nam excels in breakpoint saves with 57.03% compared to Trouve's 52.27%, a useful statistic for gauging resilience during crucial match moments.
- Overall performance in the last year highlights Ji Sung Nam's significant advantage, winning 57.50% of matches, whereas Trouve has won only 16.67%. Does this reflect a balanced skill level compared to opponents?
- Both players share a strong affiliation with Hard courts, where each boasts a 41% win rate. How does this affect their head-to-head competitiveness on such surfaces?
- In terms of match exposure, Ji Sung Nam's experience at Futures/Satellites levels (69.57% win rate) overshadows Trouve's performance in Challengers/ITF (20.00% win rate), pointing to Nam's potential superiority.
- Trouve faced better-ranked opponents over the past year, indicating a slightly challenging competition level compared to Nam.
- Ji Sung Nam's success rate in deciding sets (47%) is higher than Nathan Trouve's (33%), implying Nam's capability in clutch scenarios.
- Consideration of event-specific performance could influence predictions as players often show varied success rates across different events.
Editorial Prediction (November 16, 2025, UTC):
The comparison of recent performances and overall record indicates that Ji Sung Nam holds a substantial advantage over Nathan Trouve. Nam’s stronger return statistics and decisive breakpoint saves enhance his competitive edge.
While both players find hard courts favorable, Nam's increased match-winning experience and higher success in important matches signify his potential supremacy.
Conclusively, based on current trends and comparative statistics, Ji Sung Nam emerges as the likely victor for the upcoming match due to his consistent performance and strategic strengths.
Nathan Trouve vs Ji Sung Nam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Trouve vs J. S. Nam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 1 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:52:53 | Average Match Time | 0:52:53 |
| 46% (26/56) | 1st Serve % | 71% (24/34) |
| 38% (10/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 88% (21/24) |
| 40% (12/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (6/9) |
| 24% (8/34) | Return Points Win % | 61% (34/56) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Trouve Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
J. S. Nam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 2-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||

N. Trouve vs J. S. Nam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36.67% (11/19) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.44% (311/240) |
| 39.71% (27/41) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.88% (698/551) |
| 46.67% (287/328) | Games Win/Loss | 52.39% (6062/5508) |
| 39.13% (9/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.01% (257/186) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (28/28) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.02% (25/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 69 | Aces Total | 1046 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 64 | Total Double Faults | 980 |
| 1:2:19 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 335.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 577.61 |
| 61% (867/1417) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14598/22500) |
| 63% (543/867) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9865/14598) |
| 46% (255/550) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3864/7902) |
| 41% (56/137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1181/2681) |
| 40% (542/1349) | Return Points Win % | 43% (10139/23706) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 14.29% (1/6) | Challenger W/L | 50.22% (112/111) |
| 43.48% (10/13) | Futures W/L | 61.71% (195/121) |
| 37% (11/30) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (301/535) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 50% (3/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (77/144) |
| 38% (3/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (74/156) |
| 83% (12/10) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (311/266) |
| 17% (12/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (311/44) |
| 6% (18/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (239/45) |