Nathan Ponwith vs Lorenzo Claverie Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Ponwith vs L. Claverie

Nathan Ponwith
USA
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
23
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
874
C. Rank
875
367
Best Rank
643
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Lorenzo Claverie
VEN
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
27
Age
23
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
874
C. Rank
875
367
Best Rank
643
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Ponwith 1 - 0 Claverie
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nathan Ponwith winning 2 and Lorenzo Claverie winning 0. The last match between Nathan Ponwith and Lorenzo Claverie was at the M15 Santo Domingo, 07-12-2021, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ponwith | 1 |
| Claverie | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Santo Domingo(12-07-21)
Nathan Ponwith
6
6
Lorenzo Claverie
2
1
N. Ponwith vs L. Claverie H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.34% (190-173) | Career Total W/L | 50.33% (76-75) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Ponwith vs L. Claverie Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nathan Ponwith has won 42.52% of points on their second serve, while Lorenzo Claverie has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nathan Ponwith, in recent form, has won 42.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lorenzo Claverie has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.90% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nathan Ponwith has saved 55.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lorenzo Claverie has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nathan Ponwith has won 32.43% of matches played (W/L 12/25), with Lorenzo Claverie winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nathan Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 40/32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 34% (W/L 10/19). Lorenzo Claverie has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 37/33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Nathan Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 29.03% of matches (W/L 9/22), where as Lorenzo Claverie has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nathan Ponwith winning 1 times and Lorenzo Claverie being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nathan Ponwith winning 2 and Lorenzo Claverie winning 0.
- The last match between Nathan Ponwith and Lorenzo Claverie was at the M15 Santo Domingo, 07-12-2021, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nathan Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 417.57 while Lorenzo Claverie has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nathan Ponwith has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lorenzo Claverie has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nathan Ponwith has converted 25.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lorenzo Claverie has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nathan Ponwith vs Lorenzo Claverie Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Ponwith vs L. Claverie H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:29:0 | Average Match Time | 1:29:0 |
| 57% (31/54) | 1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) |
| 77% (24/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
| 48% (11/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 15% (3/20) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 63% (30/48) | Return Points Win % | 35% (19/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ponwith 48%, Claverie 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ponwith 49%, Claverie 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Ponwith 61%, Claverie 0%.
N. Ponwith Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 6-2 | ||
L. Claverie Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-7(7) 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(8) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||

N. Ponwith vs L. Claverie Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.34% (190/173) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.33% (76/75) |
| 51.56% (430/404) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.74% (178/166) |
| 50.74% (3953/3838) | Games Win/Loss | 50.81% (1724/1669) |
| 53.44% (140/122) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.65% (39/38) |
| 55.56% (40/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.86% (37/33) |
| 34.48% (10/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 746 | Aces Total | 554 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 987 | Total Double Faults | 368 |
| 1:19:34 | Average Match Time | 1:24:27 |
| 402.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 410.45 |
| 57% (10390/18072) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4602/7680) |
| 66% (6870/10390) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3228/4602) |
| 49% (3797/7682) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1593/3078) |
| 41% (698/1700) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (226/637) |
| 39% (6797/17556) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2862/7799) |
| 29.41% (20/48) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (7/14) |
| 57.63% (170/125) | Futures W/L | 53.08% (69/61) |
| 53% (189/360) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (76/150) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (40/83) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (27/47) |
| 54% (58/108) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (17/43) |
| 82% (194/160) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (80/64) |
| 18% (194/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (80/16) |
| 17% (169/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (71/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction05:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction10:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction06:00 PM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
07:35
H2H 0-0
07:55
H2H 0-0
12:00
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0