Prediction of Nathan Healey vs Bjorn Rehnquist Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Healey vs B. Rehnquist

Nathan Healey
AUS
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
45
Age
47
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
159
Best Rank
149
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$111.2K
Career Money
$83.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Bjorn Rehnquist
SWE
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
45
Age
47
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
159
Best Rank
149
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$111.2K
Career Money
$83.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Healey 0 - 1 Rehnquist
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nathan Healey winning 0 and Bjorn Rehnquist winning 2. The last match between Bjorn Rehnquist and Nathan Healey was at the Dublin Challenger - Dublin, 03-07-2007, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Bjorn Rehnquist getting the victory 6-2 7-6(6).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Healey | 0 |
| Rehnquist | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Dublin Challenger - Dublin(07-03-07)
Bjorn Rehnquist
6
7
Nathan Healey
2
6
N. Healey vs B. Rehnquist H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $111,195 | Career Prize Money | $83,400 |
| 52.89% (183-163) | Career Total W/L | 55.31% (255-206) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 3 | Titles | 5 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Healey vs B. Rehnquist Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nathan Healey has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Bjorn Rehnquist has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nathan Healey, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bjorn Rehnquist has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nathan Healey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bjorn Rehnquist has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nathan Healey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Bjorn Rehnquist winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nathan Healey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 36/22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 22/28). Bjorn Rehnquist has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 76/53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 26/42).
- Player level: In the last year, Nathan Healey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Bjorn Rehnquist has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nathan Healey winning 0 times and Bjorn Rehnquist being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nathan Healey winning 0 and Bjorn Rehnquist winning 2.
- The last match between Nathan Healey and Bjorn Rehnquist was at the Dublin Challenger - Dublin, 03-07-2007, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Bjorn Rehnquist getting the victory 6-2 7-6(6).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nathan Healey has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Bjorn Rehnquist has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nathan Healey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bjorn Rehnquist has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nathan Healey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bjorn Rehnquist has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nathan Healey vs Bjorn Rehnquist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Healey vs B. Rehnquist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Healey 0%, Rehnquist 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Healey 0%, Rehnquist 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Healey 0%, Rehnquist 0%.
N. Healey Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-3 7-6(1) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
B. Rehnquist Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(0) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 1-6 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||

N. Healey vs B. Rehnquist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.89% (183/163) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.31% (255/206) |
| 53.31% (435/381) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.61% (572/495) |
| 51.67% (4091/3827) | Games Win/Loss | 51.52% (5081/4781) |
| 53.99% (115/98) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.13% (123/85) |
| 44.00% (22/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.24% (26/42) |
| 40.00% (10/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.79% (97/68) |
| 62.07% (36/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.00% (9/11) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 208 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 196 | Total Double Faults | 95 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 493.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 498.98 |
| 58% (1370/2374) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1703/2834) |
| 72% (988/1370) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1053/1703) |
| 48% (479/996) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (575/1131) |
| 34% (70/204) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (128/306) |
| 35% (804/2296) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1199/2957) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Slam W/L | 41.46% (17/24) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.78% (30/37) | Main Tour W/L | 46.43% (26/30) |
| 52.04% (102/94) | Challenger W/L | 57.48% (196/145) |
| 69.64% (39/17) | Futures W/L | 69.57% (16/7) |
| 54% (176/327) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (251/451) |
| 27% (3/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 44% (63/143) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (69/130) |
| 44% (51/117) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (80/145) |
| 82% (192/157) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (245/212) |
| 18% (192/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (245/33) |
| 16% (154/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (216/42) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 23 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 10:30 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 07:00 AM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 04:35 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025
Top Predictions Today
16:35
H2H 0-0
18:00
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
22:00
H2H 0-0
22:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal