Natalija Senic vs Elena Jamshidi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 01:12 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Senic vs E. Jamshidi

SRB
1
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Senic 1 - 0 Jamshidi
They have played 1 sets in total, with Natalija Senic winning 1 and Elena Jamshidi winning 0. The last match between Natalija Senic and Elena Jamshidi was at the W35 Heraklion, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Natalija Senic getting the victory 5-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Senic | 1 |
| Jamshidi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Heraklion(10-16-25)
N. Senic vs E. Jamshidi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 72.51% (182-69) | Career Total W/L | 39.72% (85-129) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 100.00% (1-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Senic vs E. Jamshidi Match Preview:
- Looking at the second serve effectiveness over the last six months, Elena Jamshidi has a slight edge with a 33.92% win rate compared to Natalija Senic's 34.32%. Does this stat play a role in match outcomes? It often does, indicating a negligible advantage for Senic.
- In terms of returning second serves, Elena Jamshidi appears stronger, having won 52.07% of these points, surpassing Natalija Senic's 49.28%. Can this influence the match? Yes, it is often crucial in breaking serve.
- When dealing with first serve returns, Jamshidi again leads, securing 39.14% of points, whereas Senic achieves 31.54%. Does this favor Jamshidi? Absolutely, as it suggests better handling of powerful serves.
- Under pressure, saving breakpoints can turn matches. Jamshidi has a 40.85% success rate at saving breakpoints versus Senic's 37.19%. This gives a marginal edge to Jamshidi in crucial moments.
- Throughout the past year, Natalija Senic has a commanding overall win rate of 71.19% in matches, outperforming Jamshidi's 44.44%. Could this indicate a stronger contender? Likely, as it shows consistency.
- Surface preferences show Jamshidi performs best on indoor hard, with a 43% win rate. Conversely, Senic excels on clay, also with a 43% win rate. Does surface matter here? Certainly, as it affects play style.
- Analyzing the level of play, Jamshidi has predominantly competed in lower-tier ITF events, winning 46.88%, while Senic has participated in higher-level ITF and Challenger tours, winning 59.38%. Who has faced tougher competition? Arguably Jamshidi, as she faced higher-ranked opponents on average.
- In terms of resolving deciding sets, both players are equal, winning half of such sets in the past year. Is there a clear advantage here? No, both have shown equal resilience.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming match between Elena Jamshidi and Natalija Senic, the statistics present an intricate picture of both players' capabilities and potential weaknesses.
Elena Jamshidi seems to have the upper hand in return games, especially on second serves. This skill could be instrumental in gaining leverage during service games. However, Natalija Senic's overall recent win percentage suggests she has the edge in match experience and consistency.
Considering their respective focuses in tournaments, Jamshidi has encountered higher-ranked opponents on average, which might provide her with a psychological edge. Conversely, Senic's experience on the Challenger circuit implies she’s accustomed to a higher competition level.
Given these dynamics, Natalija Senic appears to be the favorite to win the upcoming match, primarily due to her higher win rate over the past year and consistent performance. Nevertheless, Jamshidi’s strengths shouldn't be underestimated and could cause an upset if she capitalizes on the opportunities presented during the match.
Natalija Senic vs Elena Jamshidi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Senic vs E. Jamshidi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 5 | Games Won | 0 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:17:11 | Average Match Time | 0:17:11 |
| 63% (5/8) | 1st Serve % | 54% (7/13) |
| 100% (5/5) | 1st Serve Win % | 14% (1/7) |
| 100% (3/3) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/6) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 92% (12/13) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/8) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Senic Recent Matches Played
E. Jamshidi Recent Matches Played

N. Senic vs E. Jamshidi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.51% (182/69) | YTD Win/Loss | 39.72% (85/129) |
| 70.82% (381/157) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.77% (190/276) |
| 60.70% (2769/1793) | Games Win/Loss | 46.35% (1902/2202) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.80% (51/74) |
| 73.44% (177/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 37.84% (28/46) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 257 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 412 | Total Double Faults | 560 |
| 1:23:10 | Average Match Time | 1:17:2 |
| 431.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.34 |
| 60% (7449/12395) | 1st Serve % | 72% (7822/10914) |
| 62% (4635/7449) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (4115/7822) |
| 49% (2434/4946) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (1238/3092) |
| 56% (1062/1903) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (651/1344) |
| 52% (6622/12659) | Return Points Win % | 46% (4878/10560) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62.69% (42/25) | Challenger W/L | 28.95% (11/27) |
| 75.96% (139/44) | Futures W/L | 42.05% (74/102) |
| 73% (179/245) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (85/210) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 59% (20/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (11/24) |
| 53% (21/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (21/40) |
| 94% (182/171) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (85/73) |
| 6% (182/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (85/12) |
| 16% (69/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (129/12) |