Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Natalia Siedliska vs Laia Petretic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siedliska vs Petretic analysis and find out who is favored!
Natalia Siedliska vs Laia Petretic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Siedliska 1 - 0 Petretic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siedliska has won 43.06% of points on his second serve, while Petretic has won 45.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siedliska, in recent form, has won 60.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Petretic has won 53.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.22% and 41.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siedliska has saved 64.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Petretic has saved 43.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siedliska has won 56.41% of matches played (W/L 22/ 17), with Petretic winning 46.51% (W/L 20/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siedliska has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 10/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Petretic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 51/ 50), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Siedliska has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 12/ 11), where as Petretic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Siedliska winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Siedliska winning 2 and Petretic winning 1. The last match between Siedliska and Petretic was at the W15 Castellon, 04-11-2022, Semifinals, Clay with Natalia Siedliska getting the victory 6-3 5-7 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Siedliska and Petretic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Siedliska winning 1 times and Petretic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Siedliska winning 0, and Petretic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siedliska has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.05 while Petretic has played against players with an average rank of 186.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siedliska has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Petretic has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siedliska has converted 41.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Petretic has converted 45.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Siedliska 1 - 0 Petretic
660
Rank
487
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
735
Rank
685
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
57% (251-192)
Career Total W/L
48% (61-66)
40% (4-6)
YTD W/L
33% (4-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Natalia Siedliska | Laia Petretic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:18:0 | 2:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (55/83) | 59% (50/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (34/55) | 54% (27/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (13/28) | 31% (11/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (8/10) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (47/85) | 43% (36/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 5-7 6-2 |
Stats 
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Laia Petretic
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Natalia Siedliska | Laia Petretic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (4/6) | 33% (4/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) | 37% (10/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (110/107) | 44% (109/137) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 31 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:54 | 1:49:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 59.4 | 151.17 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (559/775) | 65% (521/796) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (317/559) | 53% (278/521) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (93/216) | 45% (123/275) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (46/111) | 44% (48/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (343/724) | 45% (381/845) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 38% (3/5) | 36% (4/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (4/9) | 33% (4/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 57% (7/4) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 43% (7/3) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Natalia Siedliska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
59%
(
64 of
109)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Felitsata Dorofeeva-Rybas
75%
(
69 of
92)
1st Serve %
91%
(
80 of
88)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Federica Urgesi
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ella Haavisto
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
122)
3
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
2
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
65 of
122)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Yasmine Wagner
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Sevcikova
Player
Natalia Siedliska
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
Player
Natalia Siedliska
78%
(
76 of
97)
1st Serve %
75%
(
74 of
99)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yifan Sun
Player
Natalia Siedliska
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Tamara Curovic
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Natalia Siedliska
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
44
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Laia Petretic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
Player
Laia Petretic
65%
(
81 of
124)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
57 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laia Petretic
Player
Sara Dols
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Laia Petretic
83%
(
57 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laia Petretic
Player
Anastasia Mozgaleva
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Genis Salas
Player
Laia Petretic
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
5
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Laia Petretic
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laia Petretic
Player
Bojana Marinkovic
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
5
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
51 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristina Diaz Adrover
Player
Laia Petretic
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Laia Petretic
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Ganz
Player
Laia Petretic
80%
(
65 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Siedliska Vs Petretic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
