Naoki Tajima vs Isaac Becroft Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Oct at 02:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Tajima vs I. Becroft

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NZL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tajima 1 - 0 Becroft
They have played 3 sets in total, with Naoki Tajima winning 2 and Isaac Becroft winning 1. The last match between Naoki Tajima and Isaac Becroft was at the M25 Perth, 06-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Naoki Tajima getting the victory 3-6 6-0 10-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tajima | 1 |
| Becroft | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Perth(10-06-25)
N. Tajima vs I. Becroft H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 50.15% (166-165) | Career Total W/L | 59.35% (73-50) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
N. Tajima vs I. Becroft Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Isaac Becroft has a stronger second serve performance, winning 48.09% of points compared to Naoki Tajima's 33.89%. Could this give Becroft an upper hand? It appears likely given the correlation with predicting match outcomes.
- When returning their opponent's second serve, Becroft again shows superiority, claiming 47.11% of points versus Tajima's 44.87%.
- The first serve return stats are quite close, with Becroft at 24.27% and Tajima at 23.89%, making this aspect less decisive.
- Under pressure, Becroft excels by saving 51.09% of breakpoints compared to Tajima's 44.88%. Does handling pressure make a crucial difference? It often does.
- In a year-long performance review, Becroft edges out Tajima slightly, winning 62.50% of matches, while Tajima has won 60.32%.
- Becroft's best plays are on Indoor Hard surfaces with a 60% win rate. Meanwhile, Tajima thrives on Hard courts, also with 60% wins. This suggests both are well-matched in surface preferences.
- Both players show similar match rates at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with Becroft winning 64.52% and Tajima 64.41% of their respective matches.
- Tajima has faced tougher opponents on average, with their opponents having a higher average rank of 60.11 compared to Becroft's 318.34. Could this experience under challenging conditions favor Tajima?
- In matches going to a deciding set, Becroft has been significantly more successful, winning 73% compared to Tajima's 44%.
Editorial Prediction (October 5, 2025, UTC):
Isaac Becroft demonstrates notable strengths in second serve performance and returning opponents' second serves. His ability to handle high-pressure situations and a strong record in deciding sets give him a potential edge.
While Naoki Tajima has faced higher-ranked opponents and shows prowess on hard courts, these advantages might be insufficient against Becroft's consistency under pressure and superior statistics in critical match areas.
Therefore, factoring in recent trends and historical performance patterns, Isaac Becroft appears more likely to win the upcoming match.
Naoki Tajima vs Isaac Becroft Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Tajima vs I. Becroft H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 11 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:30 | Average Match Time | 1:22:30 |
| 62% (29/47) | 1st Serve % | 79% (46/58) |
| 72% (21/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 44% (8/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (3/12) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (31/58) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Tajima Recent Matches Played
I. Becroft Recent Matches Played

N. Tajima vs I. Becroft Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.15% (166/165) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.35% (73/50) |
| 50.74% (377/366) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.91% (156/123) |
| 50.51% (3443/3373) | Games Win/Loss | 53.40% (1365/1191) |
| 51.87% (125/116) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.29% (67/46) |
| 47.83% (33/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 854 | Aces Total | 219 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 933 | Total Double Faults | 212 |
| 1:15:32 | Average Match Time | 1:21:14 |
| 402.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 425.53 |
| 54% (8776/16340) | 1st Serve % | 66% (4102/6179) |
| 68% (5943/8776) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2640/4102) |
| 47% (3583/7563) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1028/2077) |
| 46% (735/1581) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (299/653) |
| 40% (6590/16392) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2578/6157) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 25.00% (5/15) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.77% (161/150) | Futures W/L | 61.34% (73/46) |
| 50% (162/322) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (71/119) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 58% (28/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (12/23) |
| 45% (37/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 69% (24/35) |
| 85% (169/143) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (63/58) |
| 15% (169/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (63/5) |
| 14% (162/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (60/14) |