Naoki Nakagawa vs Ajeet Rai Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analysis of Second Serve Performance

In recent months, Rai has exhibited a second serve success rate of 47.34%, whereas Nakagawa has achieved a commendable 51.17% in this aspect. It is worth mentioning that there exists a noteworthy correlation between these statistics and the accuracy of match predictions.

Return Game Statistics

When evaluating return game prowess, recent data reveals that Rai has triumphed in 51.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nakagawa boasts a slightly lower but still impressive rate of 49.15%. The statistics pertaining to first serve returns are equally compelling, with Rai's success rate standing at 33.19% compared to Nakagawa's 29.27%. These figures hold significant relevance in determining the favorite for this highly anticipated head-to-head matchup.

Under Pressure Analysis

Delving into the realm of clutch performances, Rai has managed to save an impressive 60% of breakpoints in recent times. Similarly, Nakagawa has displayed resilience by thwarting 58.86% of such crucial moments. These statistics serve as invaluable indicators for in-game betting predictions.

Performance Overview

Examining the broader scope of their careers, Rai has triumphed in 56.06% of matches played over the past year, boasting an impressive win-loss record of 37/29. Nakagawa, on the other hand, has displayed an even higher overall success rate of 60.87% (28/18). These figures provide us with a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.

Best Surface Preferences

When discussing preferred surfaces, Rai has excelled on hard courts, attaining a remarkable 57% success rate (157/119), while struggling slightly on indoor hard courts with a 33% winning ratio (1/2). In contrast, Nakagawa has achieved his highest win percentage on indoor hard courts, with an exceptional 61% (19/12), while facing challenges on clay where his record stands at 60% (112/74).

Player Level and Tournament Types

Within the past year, Rai has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments ($10K), managing to succeed in 60.42% of matches played (29/19). Conversely, Nakagawa has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding a $10K prize pool, with a winning record of 50% (15/15). It is important to keep in mind that when assessing statistics and predicting the favored player, these figures are contingent upon the level of events they have been competing in.

Opponent Quality Statistics

Over the course of the past year, Rai has faced opponents with an average ranking of 153.44, while Nakagawa has encountered adversaries with an average ranking of 170.15. These figures shed light on the caliber of competition each player has encountered, further aiding in determining their performance expectations.

Deciding Set Performance

If you are interested in live predictions and betting, it is worthwhile to note that Rai has emerged victorious in 50% of deciding sets played over the past 12 months. Nakagawa, on the other hand, has achieved an impressive success rate of 69% in all matches contested on tour, further emphasizing their proficiency in crucial moments.

Current Event Head-to-Head Stats

Although examining historical player performance proves indispensable in predicting tennis outcomes, it becomes equally critical to analyze current event stats for a more accurate assessment of an in-form player. For specific details regarding this aspect, kindly refer to the section below, particularly if either player has already competed in the ongoing event. It is also worth noting that certain players may exhibit better performances at specific tournaments, and this factor should be taken into consideration when predicting the ultimate outcome.

Break Point Conversion Rates

Recent records uncover Rai's ability to convert 41.98% of their breakpoint opportunities. Nakagawa, on the other hand, has demonstrated a slightly lower but still commendable rate of 40.44% when aiming to break their opponents' serve. These enlightening statistics provide astute insights for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves enjoying a breakpoint opportunity.

If you are intrigued by predictive models for tennis matches, this informative article offers an excellent starting point (Warning: Recommended for stats enthusiasts).