Nao Hibino vs Su Jeong Jang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Jang analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Su Jeong Jang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 45.51% of points on his second serve, while Jang has won 50.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 54.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jang has won 57.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.78% and 42.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 55.08% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jang has saved 50.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 57.53% of matches played (W/L 42/ 31), with Jang winning 57.45% (W/L 27/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 268/ 199), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 48). Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 68/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 16/ 11), where as Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 24/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Hibino winning 3 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Hibino winning 7 and Jang winning 2. The last match between Hibino and Jang was at the W25 Kashiwa, 09-04-2023, Final, Hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Jang have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hibino winning 0 times and Jang 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 0, and Jang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.62 while Jang has played against players with an average rank of 283.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jang has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jang has converted 49.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hibino 3 - 1 Jang
12
Total
0
Mast
6
Chall
0
Slam
3
Main
3
Minor
76
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
215
Rank
114
High
29
Age
R
Plays
13
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
56% (366-292)
Career Total W/L
60% (405-275)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$1,225,315
Career Prize Money
$340,345
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nao Hibino | Su Jeong Jang |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
Sets Won | 7 | 2 |
Games Won | 50 | 40 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 0:49:27 | 0:49:27 |
1st Serve % | 66% (92/140) | 59% (78/133) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (61/92) | 50% (39/78) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (19/48) | 47% (26/55) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 79% (11/14) | 44% (7/16) |
Return Points W% | 51% (68/133) | 43% (60/140) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 | |||||
6-4 6-3 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Su Jeong Jang
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
7-5 6-4 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Su Jeong Jang
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
5-7 6-3 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nao Hibino | Su Jeong Jang |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 33% (1/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (28/28) | 43% (3/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (259/245) | 51% (32/31) |
Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 33% (1/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.19 |
Aces Total | 42 | 6 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.29 |
DFs Total | 56 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:31 | 1:38:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 145.14 | 581.67 |
1st Serve % | 67% (1102/1653) | 66% (126/190) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (694/1102) | 56% (71/126) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (253/551) | 47% (30/64) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (91/199) | 65% (15/23) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (730/1679) | 50% (100/201) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 0% (2/0) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nao Hibino
Player
Magda Linette
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nao Hibino
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Su Jeong Jang
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Lulu Sun
Player
Su Jeong Jang
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
51%
(
24 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yue Yuan
Player
Su Jeong Jang
72%
(
91 of
126)
1st Serve %
81%
(
83 of
103)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
63 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
103)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Aoi Ito
86%
(
54 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Dalma Galfi
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yue Yuan
Player
Su Jeong Jang
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Arianne Hartono
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Destanee Aiava
Player
Su Jeong Jang
72%
(
91 of
126)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
51 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
117
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Taylah Preston
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more