Nao Hibino vs Jing-Jing Lu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Hibino vs J. Lu

Nao Hibino
JPN
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
36
1.63m
Height
-
174
C. Rank
839
56
Best Rank
159
3
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.6M
Career Money
$63.3K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-

Jing-Jing Lu
CHN
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
36
1.63m
Height
-
174
C. Rank
839
56
Best Rank
159
3
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.6M
Career Money
$63.3K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Hibino 1 - 0 Lu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nao Hibino winning 2 and Jing-Jing Lu winning 0. The last match between Nao Hibino and Jing-Jing Lu was at the Jiangxi Open - Nanchang, 28-07-2017, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hibino | 1 |
| Lu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Jiangxi Open - Nanchang(07-28-17)
Nao Hibino
6
6
Jing-Jing Lu
2
3
N. Hibino vs J. Lu H2H Profile
N. Hibino vs J. Lu Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nao Hibino has won 39.21% of points on their second serve, while Jing-Jing Lu has won 31.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nao Hibino, in recent form, has won 49.89% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jing-Jing Lu has won 52.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.26% and 35.69% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nao Hibino has saved 47.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jing-Jing Lu has saved 37.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nao Hibino has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 26/26), with Jing-Jing Lu winning 51.35% (W/L 19/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nao Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 292/223), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 55/66). Jing-Jing Lu has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 8/6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 39/38).
- Player level: In the last year, Nao Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/10), where as Jing-Jing Lu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nao Hibino winning 1 times and Jing-Jing Lu being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nao Hibino winning 2 and Jing-Jing Lu winning 0.
- The last match between Nao Hibino and Jing-Jing Lu was at the Jiangxi Open - Nanchang, 28-07-2017, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nao Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.83 while Jing-Jing Lu has played against players with an average rank of 559.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nao Hibino has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jing-Jing Lu has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nao Hibino has converted 45.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jing-Jing Lu has converted 52.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nao Hibino vs Jing-Jing Lu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Hibino vs J. Lu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:9:2 | Average Match Time | 1:9:2 |
| 57% (29/51) | 1st Serve % | 58% (26/45) |
| 69% (20/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (15/26) |
| 73% (16/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 47% (21/45) | Return Points Win % | 29% (15/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hibino 46%, Lu 38%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hibino 56%, Lu 59%.
Break Points Saved %: Hibino 54%, Lu 48%.
N. Hibino Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
J. Lu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||

N. Hibino vs J. Lu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.48% (407/340) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.66% (311/258) |
| 53.01% (908/805) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.42% (696/607) |
| 51.53% (8064/7585) | Games Win/Loss | 51.59% (6175/5795) |
| 56.70% (292/223) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.76% (247/196) |
| 45.45% (55/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.65% (39/38) |
| 57.78% (26/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1023 | Aces Total | 374 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1612 | Total Double Faults | 1355 |
| 1:12:54 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 485.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 594.28 |
| 65% (25797/39512) | 1st Serve % | 64% (13447/20956) |
| 61% (15626/25797) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (8002/13447) |
| 46% (6358/13712) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (3109/7509) |
| 48% (2294/4825) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1389/2791) |
| 45% (17789/39756) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9971/20854) |
| 47.56% (39/43) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (3/12) |
| 42.42% (28/38) | Masters W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 48.82% (103/108) | Main Tour W/L | 45.28% (24/29) |
| 59.48% (204/139) | Challenger W/L | 57.37% (253/188) |
| 82.76% (24/5) | Futures W/L | 55.10% (27/22) |
| 54% (400/735) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (303/554) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (87/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (49/109) |
| 56% (125/223) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (98/179) |
| 86% (385/331) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (290/255) |
| 14% (385/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (290/35) |
| 20% (362/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (278/56) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 29 Nov, 04:00 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 01:05 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 05:00 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 07:00 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 01:05 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 01:15 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Alafia Ayeni Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

27 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Rio Noguchi Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
13:00
H2H 0-0
13:05
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Ribeirao Preto
Brazil
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola