Nao Hibino vs Jing-Jing Lu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Hibino vs J. Lu

Nao Hibino
JPN
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
36
1.63m
Height
-
173
C. Rank
801
56
Best Rank
159
3
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.6M
Career Money
$63.3K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-

Jing-Jing Lu
CHN
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
36
1.63m
Height
-
173
C. Rank
801
56
Best Rank
159
3
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.6M
Career Money
$63.3K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Hibino 1 - 0 Lu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nao Hibino winning 2 and Jing-Jing Lu winning 0. The last match between Nao Hibino and Jing-Jing Lu was at the Jiangxi Open - Nanchang, 28-07-2017, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hibino | 1 |
| Lu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Jiangxi Open - Nanchang(07-28-17)
Nao Hibino
6
6
Jing-Jing Lu
2
3
N. Hibino vs J. Lu H2H Profile
N. Hibino vs J. Lu Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nao Hibino has won 39.97% of points on their second serve, while Jing-Jing Lu has won 32.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nao Hibino, in recent form, has won 50.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jing-Jing Lu has won 50.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.82% and 36.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nao Hibino has saved 48.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jing-Jing Lu has saved 43.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nao Hibino has won 49.02% of matches played (W/L 25/26), with Jing-Jing Lu winning 51.43% (W/L 18/17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nao Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 290/221), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 55/66). Jing-Jing Lu has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 8/6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 39/38).
- Player level: In the last year, Nao Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.00% of matches (W/L 11/9), where as Jing-Jing Lu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nao Hibino winning 1 times and Jing-Jing Lu being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nao Hibino winning 2 and Jing-Jing Lu winning 0.
- The last match between Nao Hibino and Jing-Jing Lu was at the Jiangxi Open - Nanchang, 28-07-2017, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nao Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.08 while Jing-Jing Lu has played against players with an average rank of 514.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nao Hibino has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jing-Jing Lu has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nao Hibino has converted 42.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jing-Jing Lu has converted 51.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nao Hibino vs Jing-Jing Lu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Hibino vs J. Lu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:9:2 | Average Match Time | 1:9:2 |
| 57% (29/51) | 1st Serve % | 58% (26/45) |
| 69% (20/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (15/26) |
| 73% (16/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 47% (21/45) | Return Points Win % | 29% (15/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hibino 46%, Lu 38%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hibino 56%, Lu 59%.
Break Points Saved %: Hibino 54%, Lu 50%.
N. Hibino Recent Matches Played
J. Lu Recent Matches Played

N. Hibino vs J. Lu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.51% (405/338) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.67% (310/257) |
| 52.99% (903/801) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.47% (694/604) |
| 51.53% (8017/7542) | Games Win/Loss | 51.61% (6151/5767) |
| 56.75% (290/221) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.78% (246/195) |
| 45.45% (55/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.65% (39/38) |
| 57.78% (26/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1016 | Aces Total | 370 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1600 | Total Double Faults | 1352 |
| 1:12:44 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 193.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 587.44 |
| 65% (25600/39216) | 1st Serve % | 64% (13342/20786) |
| 61% (15510/25600) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7944/13342) |
| 46% (6309/13613) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (3083/7444) |
| 48% (2275/4785) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1376/2774) |
| 45% (17644/39444) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9891/20693) |
| 47.56% (39/43) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (3/12) |
| 42.42% (28/38) | Masters W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 49.05% (103/107) | Main Tour W/L | 45.28% (24/29) |
| 59.41% (202/138) | Challenger W/L | 57.40% (252/187) |
| 82.76% (24/5) | Futures W/L | 55.10% (27/22) |
| 54% (398/731) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (302/552) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (87/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (49/109) |
| 56% (125/222) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (97/178) |
| 86% (382/329) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (290/255) |
| 13% (382/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (290/35) |
| 20% (361/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (276/55) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:30 AM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
1.87
W2
1.86
12:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
1.533
W2
2.375
02:30 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
2.3
W2
1.57
01:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
1.24
W2
3.75
01:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
3.5
W2
1.3
04:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
1.122
W2
5.5
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Hibino (Chennai Open - Chennai)
Fruhvirtova vs HibinoCould play in The Quarterfinals
Foon vs HibinoCould play in The Quarterfinals
Werner vs HibinoCould play in The Quarterfinals
Tjen vs HibinoCould play in The Quarterfinals
Hibino vs ParryCould play in The Second
Hibino vs NakloCould play in The Second
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
27 Oct 2025
Karen Khachanov vs Ethan Quinn Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Karen Khachanov vs Ethan Quinn Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard vs Grigor Dimitrov Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Lorenzo Sonego vs Sebastian Korda Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 27th October 2025 Best Bets
27 Oct 2025
Prediction Of Khachanov Vs Quinn H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Rolex Paris Masters 2025?
27 Oct 2025
Prediction Of Perricard Vs Dimitrov H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Rolex Paris Masters 2025?
Top Predictions Today
21:00
H2H 5-2
17:30
H2H 2-2
22:30
H2H 3-0
13:00
H2H 2-0
13:00
H2H 2-0
Tennis Events This Week
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris
France
Bratislava 2 Challenger
Slovakia
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
Monastir Challenger
Tunisia
Seoul Challenger
Korea, Rep.
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Hua Hin
Thailand
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Selva Gardena
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Szabolcsveresmart
Hungary
M15 Yanagawa City
Japan
M25 Brisbane
Australia
M25 Glasgow
Great Britain
M25 Qian Daohu
China