Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Janice Tjen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Tjen analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Janice Tjen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 44.76% of points on his second serve, while Tjen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 54.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tjen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.3% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 54.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tjen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Tjen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 49). Tjen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 8/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 8/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 9/ 11), where as Tjen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hibino winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hibino winning 2 and Tjen winning 0. The last match between Hibino and Tjen was at the W80 Rancho Santa Fe, 05-10-2022, First, Hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Tjen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hibino winning 0 times and Tjen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 0, and Tjen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.09 while Tjen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tjen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 48.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tjen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hibino 1 - 0 Tjen
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
56% (368-293)
Career Total W/L
53% (8-7)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,225,315
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nao Hibino | Janice Tjen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:0 | 1:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (29/43) | 47% (22/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 90% (26/29) | 64% (14/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (6/14) | 40% (10/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (23/47) | 26% (11/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Janice Tjen
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Janice Tjen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (32/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (290/274) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 146.56 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1239/1842) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (778/1239) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (276/603) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (102/218) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (815/1869) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (14/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Janice Tjen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Janice Tjen
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Janice Tjen
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
114)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
14
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
34%
(
15 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
64 of
114)
115
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Urszula Radwanska
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Maegan Manasse
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
81%
(
25 of
31)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
12 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
35
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Janice Tjen
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Shatoo Mohamad
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
