Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nao Hibino vs Catherine Cartan Bellis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hibino vs Bellis analysis and find out who is favored!
Nao Hibino vs Catherine Cartan Bellis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hibino has won 45.79% of points on his second serve, while Bellis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hibino, in recent form, has won 54.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bellis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.39% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hibino has saved 55.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bellis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hibino has won 55.71% of matches played (W/L 39/ 31), with Bellis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hibino has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 43/ 48). Bellis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 91% (W/L 10/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 22/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11), where as Bellis has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Hibino winning 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Hibino winning 3 and Bellis winning 5. The last match between Hibino and Bellis was at the U.S. Open - New York, 30-08-2017, First, Hard with Nao Hibino getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hibino and Bellis have played a deciding set 2 times, with Hibino winning 1 times and Bellis 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hibino winning 0, and Bellis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.96 while Bellis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hibino has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bellis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hibino has converted 49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bellis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hibino 1 - 2 Bellis
85
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
1
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
35
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
56% (368-292)
Career Total W/L
67% (139-67)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,228,827
Career Prize Money
$866,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nao Hibino | Catherine Cartan Bellis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 5 |
| Games Won | 34 | 43 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 13 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:50 | 1:44:50 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (135/226) | 56% (146/263) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (82/135) | 71% (103/146) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (45/91) | 47% (55/117) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (10/30) | 52% (14/27) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (105/263) | 44% (99/226) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Nao Hibino
Player
Catherine Cartan Bellis
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-1 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Nao Hibino
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Nao Hibino
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nao Hibino | Catherine Cartan Bellis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (32/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (287/262) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:16 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 149.13 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1214/1801) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (766/1214) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (271/587) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (101/215) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (797/1817) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (14/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Anna Danilina
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Nao Hibino
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
95
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Harriet Dart
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
91)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Nao Hibino
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Venus Williams
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Julia Riera
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Catherine Cartan Bellis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Catherine Cartan Bellis
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
45 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Aliona Bolsova
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Jamie Loeb
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Aliona Bolsova
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-7(4) ret. | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Sara Errani
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Gabriela Lee
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hibino Vs Bellis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nao Hibino
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
