Naho Sato vs Zi Ye Zhang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 Jul at 07:50 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Sato vs Z. Ye Zhang

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sato 1 - 0 Zhang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naho Sato winning 2 and Zi Ye Zhang winning 0. The last match between Naho Sato and Zi Ye Zhang was at the W15 Luan, 31-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Naho Sato getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Sato | 1 |
Zhang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Luan(07-31-25)
N. Sato vs Z. Y. Zhang H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$2,140 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.75% (178-125) | Career Total W/L | 53.57% (30-26) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
5 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Sato vs Z. Y. Zhang Match Preview:
- Zhang has a slight advantage in second serve performance, winning 38.16% of these points recently, compared to Sato's 36.13%. Could this be the edge needed in tight situations?
- In terms of return game effectiveness, Sato leads slightly, capturing 53% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Zhang wins 51.35%. For first serve returns, Zhang is ahead with 31.53% over Sato's 29.48%.
- Under pressure, Sato demonstrates a stronger ability by saving 53.57% of breakpoints, while Zhang only saves 44%. Could Sato's resilience be a key factor?
- Over the past year, Zhang has shown better match-winning consistency with a 55.56% win rate, whereas Sato only manages 39.47%.
- Both players excel on their preferred surfaces; Zhang performs best on hard courts with a 63% win rate, while Sato is at home on clay, boasting a 69% win rate.
- Regarding the level of play, Zhang competes mainly in Futures/Satellite events, securing 61.9% of matches, while Sato, playing more in Challengers/ITF, wins 38.24% of his matches.
- Zhang has faced tougher competition over the last year, with opponents averaging a rank of 295, compared to Sato's 394.84. Could this experience against higher-ranked players be crucial?
- In deciding sets, Zhang has a slight edge, winning 60% of these compared to Sato's 54%.
- Sato excels in converting breakpoints, succeeding 75% of the time, significantly higher than Zhang's 32.56% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (July 31, 2025, UTC):
Both players demonstrate unique strengths that could influence the upcoming match. Zhang's consistency in winning a larger portion of his matches, along with his experience against higher-ranked players, provides a solid foundation for success.
Sato's ability to save breakpoints is remarkable, suggesting resilience under pressure. Additionally, his higher success in converting breakpoints presents a notable challenge for Zhang.
Key match aspects depend on how each player capitalizes on their second serve and breakpoint chances. Ultimately, Zhang's consistency and experience against tougher opponents might give him the necessary edge.
It's likely that Zhang will emerge victorious, leveraging his proven performance patterns and experience.
Naho Sato vs Zi Ye Zhang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Sato vs Z. Y. Zhang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:49:11 | Average Match Time | 1:49:11 |
58% (36/62) | 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) |
58% (21/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (19/42) |
35% (9/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (4/24) |
44% (8/18) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (5/5) |
65% (43/66) | Return Points Win % | 52% (32/62) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Sato Recent Matches Played
Z. Y. Zhang Recent Matches Played

N. Sato vs Z. Y. Zhang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.75% (178/125) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.57% (30/26) |
56.87% (385/292) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.28% (65/57) |
53.55% (3227/2799) | Games Win/Loss | 51.01% (558/536) |
57.64% (132/97) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.17% (24/22) |
68.63% (35/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (11/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
112 | Aces Total | 11 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
884 | Total Double Faults | 122 |
1:30:52 | Average Match Time | 1:3:20 |
500.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 243.39 |
66% (11690/17706) | 1st Serve % | 70% (1521/2178) |
59% (6936/11690) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (795/1521) |
46% (2740/6016) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (269/657) |
53% (1235/2349) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (125/266) |
48% (8615/17835) | Return Points Win % | 46% (991/2153) |
50.00% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
51.82% (114/106) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (6/8) |
77.78% (63/18) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (24/18) |
58% (174/299) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (30/56) |
58% (26/45) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
56% (42/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) |
90% (169/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 97% (29/28) |
10% (169/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (29/1) |
19% (134/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (27/2) |