Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Na Li vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Mattek-Sands analysis and find out who is favored!
Na Li vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mattek-Sands has won 22.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mattek-Sands has won 51.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mattek-Sands has saved 22.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mattek-Sands winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 260/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 29/ 18). Mattek-Sands has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 107/ 82), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 180/ 173).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Li winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Li winning 5 and Mattek-Sands winning 3. The last match between Li and Mattek-Sands was at the French Open - Paris, 30-05-2013, Second, Clay with Bethanie Mattek-Sands getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Mattek-Sands have played a deciding set 2 times, with Li winning 1 times and Mattek-Sands 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Mattek-Sands 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mattek-Sands has played against players with an average rank of 81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mattek-Sands has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mattek-Sands has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Li 2 - 1 Mattek-Sands
Ret.
Rank
2
High
42
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
665
Rank
30
High
39
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
70% (402-169)
Career Total W/L
53% (356-313)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$12,713,039
Career Prize Money
$1,687,071
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Li VS Mattek-Sands H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Na Li | Bethanie Mattek-Sands |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
| Games Won | 39 | 38 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:55 | 1:59:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (166/246) | 55% (141/258) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (102/166) | 64% (90/141) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (41/80) | 46% (54/117) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (15/28) | 45% (13/29) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (114/258) | 42% (103/246) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Li VS Mattek-Sands H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Na Li
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Na Li | Bethanie Mattek-Sands |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:13:5 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 162 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 48% (20/42) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (7/20) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 23% (5/22) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (31/67) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Na Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Na Li
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Yvonne Meusburger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Paula Kania
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Na Li
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Na Li
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Samantha Stosur
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Casey Dellacqua
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Na Li
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Jie Zheng
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bethanie Mattek-Sands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
39%
(
26 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
74%
(
63 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danka Kovinic
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Xiaodi You
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Alycia Parks
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shuai Zhang
Player
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
73 of
123)
7
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
48 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
123)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Li Vs Mattek-Sands Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
