Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Murphy Cassone vs Sam Riffice Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cassone vs Riffice analysis and find out who is favored!
Murphy Cassone vs Sam Riffice Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cassone has won 47.01% of points on his second serve, while Riffice has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cassone, in recent form, has won 49.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Riffice has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.23% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cassone has saved 54.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Riffice has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cassone has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Riffice winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cassone has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 14/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Riffice has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 43/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Cassone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Riffice has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cassone winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Cassone winning 4 and Riffice winning 1. The last match between Cassone and Riffice was at the M25 Columbus, 12-08-2022, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Murphy Cassone getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cassone and Riffice have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cassone winning 1 times and Riffice 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cassone winning 0, and Riffice 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cassone has played against opponents with an average rank of 300.73 while Riffice has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cassone has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Riffice has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cassone has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Riffice has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cassone 2 - 0 Riffice
864
Rank
509
High
21
Age
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
698
Rank
487
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
58% (38-27)
Career Total W/L
64% (108-61)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Murphy Cassone | Sam Riffice |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:30 | 2:5:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (81/146) | 50% (73/147) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (64/81) | 75% (55/73) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (35/65) | 43% (32/74) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (8/17) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (60/147) | 32% (47/146) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Murphy Cassone
Player
Sam Riffice
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
8
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Sam Riffice
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Murphy Cassone | Sam Riffice |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (55/57) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:19 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 331.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (237/379) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (174/237) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (58/142) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 28% (11/39) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (141/376) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Murphy Cassone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Murphy Cassone
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
4
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Saahith Jayaraman
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Murphy Cassone
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Murphy Cassone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Murphy Cassone
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Christian Harrison
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sam Riffice Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Sam Riffice
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Alexis Galarneau
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Christian Langmo
63%
(
75 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
6
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
43 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
120
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Ezekiel Clark
51%
(
61 of
119)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
109)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Jack Pinnington Jones
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Sam Riffice
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Evan King
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
7
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
27%
(
29 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
112
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Blu Baker
50%
(
7 of
14)
1st Serve %
47%
(
8 of
17)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22
Total Points Won
9
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sam Riffice
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Cassone Vs Riffice Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
