Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Murphy Cassone vs Michael Mmoh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cassone vs Mmoh analysis and find out who is favored!
Murphy Cassone vs Michael Mmoh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cassone has won 47.01% of points on his second serve, while Mmoh has won 46.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cassone, in recent form, has won 49.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mmoh has won 48.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.23% and 31.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cassone has saved 54.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mmoh has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cassone has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Mmoh winning 53.45% (W/L 31/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cassone has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 14/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Cassone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cassone winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cassone winning 2 and Mmoh winning 1. The last match between Cassone and Mmoh was at the Little Rock Challenger, 31-05-2022, First, Hard with Murphy Cassone getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cassone and Mmoh have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cassone winning 1 times and Mmoh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cassone winning 0, and Mmoh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cassone has played against opponents with an average rank of 300.73 while Mmoh has played against players with an average rank of 236.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cassone has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mmoh has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cassone has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mmoh has converted 42.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cassone 1 - 0 Mmoh
865
Rank
509
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
114
Rank
81
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
58% (38-27)
Career Total W/L
58% (286-207)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
40% (8-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,164,400
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Murphy Cassone | Michael Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:43 | 2:0:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (45/79) | 62% (46/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (36/45) | 80% (37/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (18/34) | 29% (8/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (29/74) | 32% (25/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Murphy Cassone
Player
Michael Mmoh
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Murphy Cassone | Michael Mmoh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 40% (8/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 45% (20/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (55/57) | 49% (204/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:19 | 1:44:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 331.8 | 172.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (237/379) | 65% (856/1312) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (174/237) | 71% (607/856) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (58/142) | 46% (211/456) |
| BPs Won% Total | 28% (11/39) | 44% (47/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (141/376) | 37% (473/1287) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 17% (1/5) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Murphy Cassone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Murphy Cassone
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
4
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Saahith Jayaraman
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Murphy Cassone
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Murphy Cassone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Murphy Cassone
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Christian Harrison
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Michael Mmoh
43%
(
34 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Cassone Vs Mmoh Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
