Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs Kim David Staiger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Makhlouf vs Staiger analysis and find out who is favored!
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs Kim David Staiger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Makhlouf has won 46.69% of points on his second serve, while Staiger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Makhlouf, in recent form, has won 50.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Staiger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.94% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Makhlouf has saved 50.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Staiger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Makhlouf has won 62.12% of matches played (W/L 41/ 25), with Staiger winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Makhlouf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 64/ 43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 33/ 49). Staiger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Makhlouf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.12% of matches (W/L 41/ 25), where as Staiger has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Makhlouf winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Makhlouf winning 2 and Staiger winning 0. The last match between Makhlouf and Staiger was at the Tunisia F14 (Jerba), 07-04-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Makhlouf and Staiger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Makhlouf winning 0 times and Staiger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Makhlouf winning 1, and Staiger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Makhlouf has played against opponents with an average rank of 35.3 while Staiger has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Makhlouf has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Staiger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Makhlouf has converted 44.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Staiger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Makhlouf 1 - 0 Staiger
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
51% (103-98)
Career Total W/L
14% (1-6)
60% (21-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf | Kim David Staiger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(1) 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf | Kim David Staiger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (21/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 61% (46/30) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (385/338) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (21/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.06 | 0 |
DFs Total | 20 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 37.49 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (481/778) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (287/481) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 44% (132/297) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (33/88) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (330/820) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 60% (21/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (21/35) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Andrea Bolla
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Peter Buldorini
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luca Giacomini
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Kim David Staiger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Matej Vocel
Player
Kim David Staiger
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Kim David Staiger
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
44%
(
12 of
27)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
89%
(
24 of
27)
48
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more