Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs Jack Loge Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 10:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Nazim Makhlouf vs J. Loge

ALG
0
Win
Played
1
Win

BEL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Makhlouf 0 - 1 Loge
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf winning 0 and Jack Loge winning 2. The last match between Jack Loge and Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf was at the M25 Monastir, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Jack Loge getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Makhlouf | 0 |
| Loge | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Monastir(10-16-25)
M. N. Makhlouf vs J. Loge H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.88% (166-154) | Career Total W/L | 58.25% (120-86) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. N. Makhlouf vs J. Loge Match Preview:
- In recent performance, Jack Loge outperforms Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf on second serve points with 45.75% compared to Makhlouf's 41.42%.
- Jack Loge also has an edge in return games, winning 45.59% of second serve return points versus Makhlouf's 43.46%.
- First serve return stats favor Jack Loge at 32.11% over Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf's 29.60%, indicating a slight advantage in receiving.
- When it comes to saving breakpoints, both players are closely matched, with Makhlouf at 55.42% and Loge at 54.48%.
- Overall match statistics in the last year show Jack Loge's superior performance, winning 65.75% of his matches compared to Makhlouf's 53.42%.
- On hard court surfaces, both players have identical win percentages of 57%, but Loge struggles more on indoor hard courts.
- Both have primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, but Loge has a better win ratio at this level.
- Strikingly, Loge's recent opponents have been lower-ranked on average than those faced by Makhlouf, with ranks of 415.63 compared to Makhlouf's 270.53.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Loge exhibits a significant advantage, winning 65% of such matches, whereas Makhlouf only wins 40%.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the statistical data reveals subtle yet important differences between Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf and Jack Loge. Jack Loge demonstrates a stronger performance in critical areas such as second serve execution and return games, giving him a marginal edge.
With a higher overall match win percentage and a noteworthy ability to perform in deciding sets, Loge appears to have a strategic advantage. While both players have a strong record on hard courts, Loge's recent match history and his ability to face lower-ranked opponents suggest he is more consistent.
Given these considerations, Jack Loge is the more likely contender to win the upcoming tennis match against Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf.
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs Jack Loge Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. N. Makhlouf vs J. Loge H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 4 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:0:46 | Average Match Time | 1:0:46 |
| 52% (25/48) | 1st Serve % | 71% (36/51) |
| 56% (14/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (24/36) |
| 30% (7/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (10/15) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Pts Won % | 83% (5/6) |
| 33% (17/51) | Return Points Win % | 56% (27/48) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. N. Makhlouf Recent Matches Played
J. Loge Recent Matches Played

M. N. Makhlouf vs J. Loge Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.88% (166/154) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.25% (120/86) |
| 52.36% (377/343) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.88% (266/210) |
| 51.22% (3460/3295) | Games Win/Loss | 52.15% (2351/2157) |
| 56.19% (127/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.75% (64/38) |
| 40.24% (33/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.79% (53/42) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 465 | Aces Total | 364 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 377 | Total Double Faults | 521 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:19:24 |
| 307.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 367.3 |
| 59% (7071/11901) | 1st Serve % | 63% (6976/11154) |
| 64% (4500/7071) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (4508/6976) |
| 46% (2222/4830) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2016/4178) |
| 43% (514/1195) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (561/1285) |
| 40% (4811/12006) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4818/11391) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 52.20% (166/152) | Futures W/L | 58.29% (116/83) |
| 51% (161/315) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (115/200) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 42% (25/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (24/41) |
| 41% (32/79) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (37/66) |
| 87% (164/142) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (115/100) |
| 13% (164/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (115/14) |
| 15% (156/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (91/19) |