Mitchell Sheldon vs Matisse Farzam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sheldon vs M. Farzam

Mitchell Sheldon
USA
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
18
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Matisse Farzam
USA
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
18
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Sheldon 1 - 0 Farzam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mitchell Sheldon winning 2 and Matisse Farzam winning 0. The last match between Mitchell Sheldon and Matisse Farzam was at the M25 Columbus, 13-11-2024, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Mitchell Sheldon getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sheldon | 1 |
| Farzam | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Columbus(11-13-24)
Mitchell Sheldon
7
6
Matisse Farzam
6
3
M. Sheldon vs M. Farzam H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 33.33% (5-10) | Career Total W/L | 46.15% (6-7) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Sheldon vs M. Farzam Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mitchell Sheldon has won 50.00% of points on their second serve, while Matisse Farzam has won 40.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mitchell Sheldon, in recent form, has won 44.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matisse Farzam has won 37.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 19.15% and 37.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mitchell Sheldon has saved 71.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matisse Farzam has saved 60.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mitchell Sheldon has won 14.29% of matches played (W/L 1/6), with Matisse Farzam winning 60.00% (W/L 3/2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mitchell Sheldon has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Matisse Farzam has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Mitchell Sheldon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 14.29% of matches (W/L 1/6), where as Matisse Farzam has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.00% of matches (W/L 3/2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mitchell Sheldon winning 1 times and Matisse Farzam being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mitchell Sheldon winning 2 and Matisse Farzam winning 0.
- The last match between Mitchell Sheldon and Matisse Farzam was at the M25 Columbus, 13-11-2024, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Mitchell Sheldon getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mitchell Sheldon has played against opponents with an average rank of 64.29 while Matisse Farzam has played against players with an average rank of 178.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mitchell Sheldon has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matisse Farzam has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mitchell Sheldon has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matisse Farzam has converted 38.10% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mitchell Sheldon vs Matisse Farzam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Sheldon vs M. Farzam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:20:0 | Average Match Time | 1:20:0 |
| 54% (31/57) | 1st Serve % | 70% (42/60) |
| 87% (27/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (30/42) |
| 69% (18/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (9/18) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 35% (21/60) | Return Points Win % | 21% (12/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sheldon 50%, Farzam 58%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sheldon 44%, Farzam 59%.
Break Points Saved %: Sheldon 71%, Farzam 68%.
M. Sheldon Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 0-6 6-1 10-6 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-7(6) 10-8 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
M. Farzam Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||

M. Sheldon vs M. Farzam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.33% (5/10) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 37.14% (13/22) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.16% (14/17) |
| 47.09% (170/191) | Games Win/Loss | 48.68% (148/156) |
| 25.00% (2/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 9 | Aces Total | 17 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 20 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:13:50 |
| 107.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 293.62 |
| 62% (211/339) | 1st Serve % | 62% (365/586) |
| 67% (141/211) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (220/365) |
| 49% (63/128) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (116/221) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (22/57) |
| 33% (100/302) | Return Points Win % | 39% (231/587) |
| 33.33% (5/10) | Futures W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 33% (5/15) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 40% (2/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 83% (6/5) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (6/4) |
| 17% (6/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (6/2) |
| 0% (9/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (7/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction04:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction03:15 AM 21/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction02:30 PM 20/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Noma Akugue Noha Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:05
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal