Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Zane Khan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Khan analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Zane Khan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.81% of points on his second serve, while Khan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.45% of his opponent's second serve points, while Khan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.68% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 59.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Khan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 55.74% of matches played (W/L 34/ 27), with Khan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Khan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 57/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 26/ 22), where as Khan has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Khan winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Khan was at the Little Rock Challenger, 31-05-2021, First, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:23.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Khan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Khan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Khan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 262.31 while Khan has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 32% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Khan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Khan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Khan
277
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
404
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
53% (397-354)
Career Total W/L
65% (62-34)
63% (17-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$2,555
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Zane Khan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:23 | 1:18:23 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (37/54) | 58% (31/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (26/37) | 71% (22/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (10/17) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (24/53) | 33% (18/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Zane Khan
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Zane Khan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (17/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (40/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (349/317) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 111 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:43 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 315 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1361/2074) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (946/1361) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (375/713) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (82/195) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (888/2224) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (16/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (17/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 72% (13/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zane Khan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Zane Khan
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Zane Khan
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
46 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Damir Dzumhur
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Zane Khan
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
2)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
6
Total Points Won
0
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Takuto Niki
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Pedro Araujo
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Zane Khan
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Khan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
