Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Calum Puttergill Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Puttergill analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Calum Puttergill Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.31% of points on his second serve, while Puttergill has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 50.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Puttergill has won 55.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.33% and 33.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Puttergill has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Puttergill winning 40% (W/L 12/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 109/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 38/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.06% of matches (W/L 24/ 23), where as Puttergill has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36% of matches (W/L 9/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krueger winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Krueger winning 4 and Puttergill winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Puttergill was at the Australia F10, 17-11-2014, Second, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Puttergill have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Puttergill 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Puttergill 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.53 while Puttergill has played against players with an average rank of 191.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Puttergill has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 41.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Puttergill has converted 51.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 2 - 0 Puttergill
277
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
879
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
53% (394-354)
Career Total W/L
50% (170-172)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Krueger VS Puttergill H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Krueger VS Puttergill H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (34/23) | 56% (9/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (309/291) | 51% (71/69) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 102 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:8 | 1:48:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 345.29 | 172.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1233/1868) | 64% (282/442) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (855/1233) | 65% (184/282) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (330/635) | 48% (77/160) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (71/174) | 57% (23/40) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (786/1993) | 43% (198/458) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (13/8) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (14/24) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (10/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
53%
(
65 of
122)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
105)
6
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
0
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
54%
(
31 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
46 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Calum Puttergill
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Puttergill Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
