Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Frank vs Facundo Mena Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Frank vs Mena analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Frank vs Facundo Mena Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frank has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Mena has won 51.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frank, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mena has won 55.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Frank has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mena has saved 62.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Frank has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mena winning 68.12% (W/L 47/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Frank has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 42/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 26/ 25). Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Frank winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Frank winning 2 and Mena winning 0. The last match between Frank and Mena was at the USA F19, 30-06-2014, First, Clay with Mitchell Frank getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Frank and Mena have played a deciding set 0 times, with Frank winning 0 times and Mena 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Frank winning 0, and Mena 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frank has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mena has played against players with an average rank of 285.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frank has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mena has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Frank has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mena has converted 48.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Frank 1 - 0 Mena
Ret.
Rank
503
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
401
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
58% (76-55)
Career Total W/L
57% (459-351)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
65% (17-9)
$8,905
Career Prize Money
$140,110
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mitchell Frank | Facundo Mena |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Frank | Facundo Mena |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (36/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (282/205) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (14/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 103 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 360.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (791/1419) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (578/791) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (325/628) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 52% (90/172) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (695/1558) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (6/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Mitchell Frank Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mitchell Frank
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
11
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Frank
Player
Antun Vidak
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dimitriy Voronin
Player
Mitchell Frank
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
81%
(
57 of
70)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
88
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Frank
Player
Vladyslav Manafov
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Mitchell Frank
74%
(
75 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
Player
Mitchell Frank
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
57 of
78)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Mitchell Frank
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Miguel Angel Cabrera
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Kousuke Ogura
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Facundo Mena
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Skander Mansouri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
31 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Arjun Kadhe
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Facundo Mena
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
51)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Alafia Ayeni
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Frank Vs Mena Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
