Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Misaki Matsuda vs Veronika Erjavec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Matsuda vs Erjavec analysis and find out who is favored!
Misaki Matsuda vs Veronika Erjavec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matsuda has won 51.48% of points on his second serve, while Erjavec has won 46.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matsuda, in recent form, has won 59.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Erjavec has won 58.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.42% and 41.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matsuda has saved 50.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erjavec has saved 50.39% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matsuda has won 53.66% of matches played (W/L 22/ 19), with Erjavec winning 66.22% (W/L 49/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matsuda has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 10/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 59/ 51). Erjavec has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 185/ 93), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Matsuda has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.66% of matches (W/L 22/ 19), where as Erjavec has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.01% of matches (W/L 49/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Matsuda winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Matsuda winning 2 and Erjavec winning 0. The last match between Matsuda and Erjavec was at the W25 Frydek Mistek, 08-09-2021, First, Clay with Misaki Matsuda getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Matsuda and Erjavec have played a deciding set 0 times, with Matsuda winning 0 times and Erjavec 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Matsuda winning 1, and Erjavec 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matsuda has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.88 while Erjavec has played against players with an average rank of 287.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matsuda has won 17% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erjavec has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matsuda has converted 49.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erjavec has converted 45.99% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Matsuda 1 - 0 Erjavec
533
Rank
254
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
169
Rank
169
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
61% (151-98)
Career Total W/L
64% (214-122)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
61% (20-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Misaki Matsuda | Veronika Erjavec |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (57/78) | 51% (43/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (37/57) | 56% (24/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (7/21) | 44% (18/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 33% (4/12) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (42/84) | 44% (34/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Veronika Erjavec
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Misaki Matsuda | Veronika Erjavec |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 61% (20/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (28/19) | 60% (46/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (228/205) | 53% (363/322) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 81% (13/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 34 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:36 | 1:37:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 328.35 | 273.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (1063/1441) | 67% (1455/2175) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (603/1063) | 60% (879/1455) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (194/378) | 47% (335/720) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (90/179) | 46% (149/324) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (671/1451) | 48% (1089/2285) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 67% (20/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 61% (20/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 14% (1/7) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (15/10) | 90% (20/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (15/5) | 10% (20/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 15% (13/2) |
Misaki Matsuda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Misaki Matsuda
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
72%
(
77 of
107)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Misaki Matsuda
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
85 of
113)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Ayano Shimizu
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qianhui Tang
Player
Misaki Matsuda
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
78%
(
84 of
108)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
46 of
84)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Chihiro Muramatsu
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Lisa-Marie Rioux
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Misaki Matsuda
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Misaki Matsuda
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emerson Jones
Player
Misaki Matsuda
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Misaki Matsuda
Player
Alana Subasic
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Veronika Erjavec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Veronika Erjavec
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
74%
(
77 of
104)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Ipek Oz
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Sinja Kraus
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
45
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Polona Hercog
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Antonia Ruzic
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Lea Boskovic
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Matsuda Vs Erjavec Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
