Mirza Basic vs Daniel Uta Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 08:25 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Basic vs D. Uta

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Basic 1 - 0 Uta
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mirza Basic winning 2 and Daniel Uta winning 0. The last match between Mirza Basic and Daniel Uta was at the M15 Bol, 23-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Mirza Basic getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Basic | 1 |
| Uta | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Bol(10-23-25)
M. Basic vs D. Uta H2H Profile
M. Basic vs D. Uta Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Mirza Basic has a stronger second serve performance, winning 43.84% of points compared to Daniel Uta's 40.18%. What does this suggest about their match prospects? It gives Basic a slight edge in serve-related exchanges.
- Regarding return games, Daniel Uta has a slight advantage on second serve returns, winning 41.30% compared to Basic’s 41.00%. However, for first serve returns, Uta significantly outperforms Basic at 33.08% versus 28.34%.
- Under pressure, Uta saves 53.28% of breakpoints, overshadowing Basic's 46.20% save rate. Could this give Uta an advantage in crucial moments? Yes, it may help Uta in pressure situations.
- Over the last year, Basic's winning percentage is 68.42%, considerably higher than Uta's 47.62%, indicating a stronger overall recent performance. Could this overall consistency favor Basic? It likely does.
- Basic excels on indoor hard courts with a career win rate of 58%, whereas Uta's best is on clay with the same percentage. How might this affect their match? It could depend on the surface they play on, favoring Basic on indoor hard courts.
- Basic has performed better in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 74.47% over the past year, as opposed to Uta's 50.00%. Indicates Basic's dominance at this competition level.
- Basic has faced opponents ranked on average 429.89, whereas Uta's opponents have been ranked higher on average at 222.9. Does this imply anything? Uta might be more accustomed to higher-level competition.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Basic wins 56% of the time over the past 12 months, while Uta wins just 33%. This suggests more endurance and clutch performance by Basic in extended matches.
- Considering event-specific performances and recent form can also be pivotal, yet such data is not currently detailed but is advised to be checked when available.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the various performance metrics, Mirza Basic shows a comprehensive advantage in several areas, including overall match win percentage and specific strengths on indoor hard courts, which are crucial for predicting the match outcome.
Despite Daniel Uta's slightly better capability in clutch breakpoint situations, Basic's superior handling of deciding sets and more consistent tournament success positions him favorably.
Therefore, considering the data at hand, Mirza Basic appears to be the likely winner of the upcoming contest against Daniel Uta.
Mirza Basic vs Daniel Uta Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Basic vs D. Uta H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:36:45 | Average Match Time | 1:36:45 |
| 63% (33/52) | 1st Serve % | 60% (50/84) |
| 73% (24/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (24/50) |
| 58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (17/34) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 51% (43/84) | Return Points Win % | 33% (17/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Basic Recent Matches Played
D. Uta Recent Matches Played

M. Basic vs D. Uta Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.13% (525/394) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.89% (31/43) |
| 55.27% (1170/947) | Sets Win/Loss | 43.21% (70/92) |
| 51.62% (10621/9954) | Games Win/Loss | 47.17% (684/766) |
| 57.14% (132/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 57.18% (203/152) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.06% (31/41) |
| 58.86% (176/123) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 41.18% (14/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 3219 | Aces Total | 51 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1223 | Total Double Faults | 92 |
| 1:7:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 581.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 184.86 |
| 61% (28902/47444) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1150/1898) |
| 71% (20589/28902) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (652/1150) |
| 52% (9678/18540) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (305/748) |
| 41% (1742/4252) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (70/154) |
| 37% (17802/47677) | Return Points Win % | 38% (662/1762) |
| 34.15% (14/27) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.15% (12/14) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.89% (55/51) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.70% (249/198) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 67.25% (191/93) | Futures W/L | 43.94% (29/37) |
| 57% (503/878) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (30/73) |
| 58% (14/24) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (185/321) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (6/10) |
| 57% (150/264) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 87% (494/432) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (31/27) |
| 12% (494/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (31/4) |
| 22% (424/93) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (43/3) |