Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Danielle Lao Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bjorklund vs Lao analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirjam Bjorklund vs Danielle Lao Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bjorklund has won 63.01% of points on his second serve, while Lao has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bjorklund, in recent form, has won 59.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lao has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.52% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bjorklund has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lao has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bjorklund has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 16/ 8), with Lao winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bjorklund has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 16/ 22). Lao has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 22/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Bjorklund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 11/ 4), where as Lao has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bjorklund winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bjorklund winning 0 and Lao winning 2. The last match between Bjorklund and Lao was at the W25 Claremont, 11-10-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Danielle Lao getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bjorklund and Lao have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bjorklund winning 0 times and Lao 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bjorklund winning 0, and Lao 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bjorklund has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.04 while Lao has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bjorklund has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lao has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bjorklund has converted 64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lao has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bjorklund 0 - 1 Lao
261
Rank
123
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
840
Rank
152
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
61% (215-136)
Career Total W/L
55% (214-173)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$378,603
Career Prize Money
$211,737
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mirjam Bjorklund | Danielle Lao |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:0 | 1:48:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (32/57) | 52% (33/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (19/32) | 67% (22/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 47% (14/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (27/63) | 49% (28/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Danielle Lao
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mirjam Bjorklund | Danielle Lao |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 61% (37/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 153.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (119/192) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (70/119) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 63% (46/73) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 64% (16/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (93/193) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mirjam Bjorklund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
50%
(
7 of
14)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
25
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Carla Tomai
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
105 of
147)
6
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
0
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
68 of
147)
122
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Ankita Raina
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Makenna Jones
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Mirjam Bjorklund
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Danielle Lao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Danielle Lao
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Lao
Player
Olivia Lincer
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Danielle Lao
63%
(
80 of
128)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
101)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
58 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
113
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Storm Hunter
Player
Danielle Lao
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
83 of
113)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Danielle Lao
Player
Allura Zamarripa
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Lao
Player
Marcela Zacarias
74%
(
90 of
121)
1st Serve %
82%
(
85 of
104)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
51 of
85)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
57 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
116
|
1-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Danielle Lao
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danielle Lao
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
6
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Danielle Lao
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
76%
(
57 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Bjorklund Vs Lao Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
