Prediction of Min Tang vs Eline Chiew Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Tang vs E. Chiew

Min Tang
Min Tang

Flag HKG HKG

l
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
Eline Chiew
Eline Chiew

Flag MAS MAS

l
l
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

54
Age
0
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
112
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Tang 1 - 0 Chiew

They have played 2 sets in total, with Min Tang winning 2 and Eline Chiew winning 0. The last match between Min Tang and Eline Chiew was at the ITF Kuala Lumpur, 29-04-1991, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Min Tang getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Tang1
Chiew0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3ITF Kuala Lumpur(04-29-91)

Hard
HKG Flag
Min Tang
6
6
MAS Flag
Eline Chiew
2
1

M. Tang vs E. Chiew H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
66.18% (135-69)Career Total W/L0.00% (0-5)
1Hard0
6Titles0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

M. Tang vs E. Chiew Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Min Tang has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Eline Chiew has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Min Tang, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eline Chiew has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Min Tang has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eline Chiew has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Min Tang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Eline Chiew winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Min Tang has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 81% (W/L 13/3), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 57% (W/L 12/9). Eline Chiew has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 81% (W/L 0/5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/5).
  • Player level: In the last year, Min Tang has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Eline Chiew has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Min Tang winning 1 times and Eline Chiew being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Min Tang winning 2 and Eline Chiew winning 0.
  • The last match between Min Tang and Eline Chiew was at the ITF Kuala Lumpur, 29-04-1991, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Min Tang getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Min Tang has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Eline Chiew has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Min Tang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eline Chiew has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Min Tang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eline Chiew has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Min Tang vs Eline Chiew Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Tang vs E. Chiew H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won3
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Tang 0%, Chiew 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tang 0%, Chiew 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Tang 0%, Chiew 0%.

M. Tang Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClaySeoul II 25K - 06-05-1996

R3

AUSJ. Taylor
L
6-3 6-2
ClaySeoul I 25K - 29-04-1996

R3

JPNY. Hosoki
L
6-1 7-6
N/AUnknown Tournament - 15-04-1996

Q3

USAC. Morariu
L
6-0 6-0

Q2

JPNY. Kitamura
W
6-1 6-0

R3

JPNA. Sugiyama
L
6-1 6-4

E. Chiew Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardITF Singapore - 29-11-1993

R3

N/AU. Player
L
6-4 6-1
HardITF Bangkok 4 - 22-11-1993

R3

N/AU. Player
L
7-6(1) 6-4
HardKuala Lumpur - 19-04-1993

Q1

INAJ. Riana
L
6-2 6-2
HardKuala Lumpur - 20-04-1992

Q1

USAK. Dreyer
L
6-1 7-5
HardITF Kuala Lumpur - 29-04-1991

R3

HKGM. Tang
L
6-2 6-1
banner

M. Tang vs E. Chiew Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
66.18% (135/69)YTD Win/Loss0.00% (0/5)
64.49% (296/163)Sets Win/Loss0.00% (0/10)
56.23% (2282/1776)Games Win/Loss31.11% (28/62)
65.45% (72/38)Hard Win/Loss0.00% (0/5)
66.67% (38/19)Clay Win/Loss0% (0/0)
81.25% (13/3)Grass Win/Loss0% (0/0)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
447.87Average Opponent Rank345.6
0.00% (0/2)Slam W/L0% (0/0)
53.33% (8/7)Cups W/L0% (0/0)
71.62% (106/42)Challenger W/L0.00% (0/3)
57.14% (8/6)Futures W/L0% (0/0)
66% (134/203)Best of 3 Sets Win %0% (0/5)
100% (1/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
58% (14/24)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)0% (0/1)
50% (25/50)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/0)
88% (139/122)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
12% (139/17)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
20% (65/13)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (5/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
CANA. Donskiq
ITAF. TabaccoWC
W1
1.42
W2
2.61
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
MDAR. Albot
UKRV. Orlov
W1
1.37
W2
2.8
07:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
AUTN. Oberleitner
TPEY. H. Hsu5
W1
3.48
W2
1.25
03:20 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
USAR. DickersonALT
BOLM. Dellien7
W1
1.047
W2
7.6
07:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
KORH. Chung
JPNK. Uchida8
W1
2.22
W2
1.571
04:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
TURM. Alkaya
GERJ. Opitzq
W1
1.24
W2
3.56