Miliaan Niesten vs Pol Wattanakul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Niesten vs Wattanakul analysis and find out who is favored!
Miliaan Niesten vs Pol Wattanakul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Niesten has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Wattanakul has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Niesten, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wattanakul has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Niesten has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wattanakul has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Niesten has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Wattanakul winning 59.09% (W/L 13/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Niesten has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 140/ 83), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 16/ 17). Wattanakul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 5/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Niesten winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Niesten winning 2 and Wattanakul winning 1. The last match between Niesten and Wattanakul was at the Thailand F10 (Hua Hin), 27-11-2017, First, Hard with Miliaan Niesten getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Niesten and Wattanakul have played a deciding set 1 times, with Niesten winning 1 times and Wattanakul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Niesten winning 0, and Wattanakul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Niesten has played against opponents with an average rank of while Wattanakul has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Niesten has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wattanakul has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Niesten has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wattanakul has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Niesten 1 - 0 Wattanakul
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Ret.
Rank
431
High
35
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
631
Rank
598
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (229-166)
Career Total W/L
45% (112-139)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,790
Career Prize Money
$2,420
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Niesten VS Wattanakul H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Miliaan Niesten | Pol Wattanakul |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 13 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
1st Serve % | 73% (65/89) | 59% (63/107) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (46/65) | 73% (46/63) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (12/24) | 36% (16/44) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 23% (3/13) | 43% (3/7) |
Return Points W% | 42% (45/107) | 35% (31/89) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Niesten VS Wattanakul H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 3-6 7-5 |
Miliaan Niesten
Player
Pol Wattanakul
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
107)
0
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Miliaan Niesten | Pol Wattanakul |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Miliaan Niesten Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Cameron Norrie
Player
Miliaan Niesten
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
81%
(
30 of
37)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yannick Maden
Player
Miliaan Niesten
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
0-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Miliaan Niesten
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alex Bolt
Player
Miliaan Niesten
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Miliaan Niesten
Player
Yunseong Chung
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Makoto Ochi
Player
Miliaan Niesten
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Lucas Gerch
Player
Miliaan Niesten
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Miliaan Niesten
Player
Dhruv Sunish
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Miliaan Niesten
41%
(
33 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Miliaan Niesten
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Pol Wattanakul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maximus Jones
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
11
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Kody Pearson
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Thanapet Chanta
Player
Pol Wattanakul
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
2
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
11
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(3) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Chukang Wang
Player
Pol Wattanakul
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Tao Mu
51%
(
58 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
6
13
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Jimmy Yang
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Jin
Player
Pol Wattanakul
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Pol Wattanakul
Player
He Ziheng
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more