Mikalai Haliak vs Aliaksandr Liaonenka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Examining the players' second serve efficiency over the last six months, Liaonenka has secured 47.69% of points, whereas Haliak has been slightly more effective with 49.43%. This statistic is significantly linked to predicting the outcome of matches. Furthermore, in their return game performance, Liaonenka has managed to win 43.75% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Haliak has an edge with 50.78%.

An interesting observation emerges from each player's ability to withstand pressure. Liaonenka has effectively saved 52.31% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Haliak has demonstrated superior resilience by saving 58.33%. This statistic becomes extremely useful when considering in-game betting predictions. Over the past year, Liaonenka's match-winning percentage stands at 39.39% with a win/loss record of 13/20. In comparison, Haliak has a slightly better success rate, winning 44.9% of matches (W/L 22/27), providing a foundational prediction outlook for their head-to-head clashes.

The players' preferred surfaces offer additional insight into their past achievements. Liaonenka’s best performance by surface is on Hard courts with a win rate of 52%, while struggling more on Clay courts where she has a win rate of only 48%. Conversely, Haliak excels on Grass with a 67% win ratio, although he has had less success on Hard courts, where his win percentage is just 46%. When examining the level of tournaments they've competed in over the past year, Liaonenka primarily played in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/20), whereas Haliak played similar events but with greater success, as indicated by his 62.96% win rate (W/L 17/10).

When considering the head-to-head history, Haliak has consistently emerged victorious against Liaonenka in their two previous encounters, winning both matches and 4 out of 5 sets played. Their overall competitive history indicates that Haliak tends to excel in high-pressure situations: he has outperformed Liaonenka in three tiebreaks out of four. Historically, matches between these two averaged 2:26:30 in duration, offering insight into the expected match length.

Additionally, should the forthcoming match extend to a deciding set, recent trends provide Haliak with a further advantage; he has a 42% win rate in deciding sets compared to Liaonenka's 22% over the past 12 months. It's also worth noting the average rank of their opponents, with Haliak’s competitors ranking slightly higher (average rank 393.49) than those Liaonenka faced (average rank 411.73).

Despite Liaonenka demonstrating skill in various areas, based on current statistics, Haliak is projected to win. His higher breakpoint conversion rate (43.59%), superior ability to handle pressure situations, and consistent past performance against Liaonenka all serve as compelling indicators of his advantage in the upcoming match. As the players head into this contest, statistical precedence favors Haliak to triumph once again.