Miguel Tobon vs Aidan Mayo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

As we turn our attention to the opening serve performance, a vital metric in tennis, we find Mayo displaying a solid edge over Tobon. Mayo has secured 48.11% of points on their second serve in the past six months. How does Tobon compare? Their recent record shows they’ve won 43.03% of second serve points, a figure marginally lower than Mayo's. The correlation between these statistics and predicting match outcomes is notably strong, offering a clue into who holds the upper hand as they face off.

Delving into their return game, Mayo once again takes a slight lead, having won 45.83% of their opponents' second serve points compared to Tobon's 44%. When it comes to handling first serve returns, Tobon turns the table, triumphing 28.57% of the time against Mayo's 25.8%. These return metrics often play a vital role in forecasting who might outdo the other in their head-to-head matchup.

Under pressure, during breakpoints, who holds their nerve better? Mayo saves 52.71% of breakpoints, slightly outshining Tobon’s 47.01%. Such figures become critical when the game is neck and neck and the pressure is palpable. Furthermore, assessing their match-winning capabilities over the last year, Mayo has won 48.15% of their matches (W/L 26/28), clearly having an edge over Tobon's 42.86% (W/L 9/12).

Specializing on specific surfaces can be pivotal. Mayo provides their best on hard courts with a career win rate of 56% (W/L 79/61), contrasting with their 41% win on clay. Surprisingly, Tobon also records their best career surface win rate on hard courts at 50% (W/L 4/4), but struggles more significantly on clay, with just a 26% win rate (W/L 6/17).

When considering the level of tournaments, Mayo has mostly competed in Challengers/ITF over the past year, securing half of their matches (W/L 25/25), while Tobon, mostly appears in Futures/Satellites, winning 43.75% (W/L 7/9). In terms of opponent quality, Mayo has played against competitors with an average ranking of 238.87, while Tobon confronted players with a slightly tougher average rank of 203.

For those focusing on potential deciders, Tobon has showcased a knack for winning deciding sets with a 57% success rate over the last year, whereas Mayo stands at 38%. As the game progresses, a crucial breakpoint conversion could tilt the balance, and Mayo leads here converting 37.14% versus Tobon's 34.62% in recent form.

Taking all these dynamics into account, from serve statistics to surface preferences and recent form, it seems the scales tip slightly in favor of Mayo to clinch victory. Their robust performance indicators suggest they might edge out Tobon in this encounter. Will they capitalize on these advantages? The court will soon reveal all.