Prediction of Michal Chmela vs Tapio Nurminen Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Chmela vs T. Nurminen
Michal Chmela
POL
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
48
Age
50
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Tapio Nurminen
FIN
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
48
Age
50
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Chmela 1 - 0 Nurminen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Michal Chmela winning 2 and Tapio Nurminen winning 1. The last match between Michal Chmela and Tapio Nurminen was at the Qwarant Cup - Sopot, 10-08-1998, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Michal Chmela getting the victory 1-6 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chmela | 1 |
| Nurminen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) Qwarant Cup - Sopot(08-10-98)
Michal Chmela
1
6
6
Tapio Nurminen
6
1
4
M. Chmela vs T. Nurminen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.94% (9-8) | Career Total W/L | 43.30% (42-55) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Chmela vs T. Nurminen Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michal Chmela has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tapio Nurminen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michal Chmela, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tapio Nurminen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michal Chmela has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tapio Nurminen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michal Chmela has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tapio Nurminen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michal Chmela has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 9/8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 9/8). Tapio Nurminen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 33/37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Michal Chmela has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tapio Nurminen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michal Chmela winning 1 times and Tapio Nurminen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Michal Chmela winning 2 and Tapio Nurminen winning 1.
- The last match between Michal Chmela and Tapio Nurminen was at the Qwarant Cup - Sopot, 10-08-1998, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Michal Chmela getting the victory 1-6 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michal Chmela has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tapio Nurminen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michal Chmela has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tapio Nurminen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michal Chmela has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tapio Nurminen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Michal Chmela vs Tapio Nurminen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Chmela vs T. Nurminen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Chmela 0%, Nurminen 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Chmela 0%, Nurminen 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Chmela 0%, Nurminen 0%.
M. Chmela Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warta Cup - Sopot - 07-08-2000 | ||||
Q1 Andrzej GrusieckiA. Grusiecki | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q2  Santiago VenturaS. Ventura | L | 7-6(5) 6-2 | ||
| Polish Open 2000 - Poznan - 31-07-2000 | ||||
Q1  Adrian GarciaA. Garcia | L | 5-7 6-1 7-6(5) | ||
| Warta Cup - Sopot - 09-08-1999 | ||||
R1  Zeljko KrajanZ. Krajan | L | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | ||
| Polish Open 99 - Poznan - 02-08-1999 | ||||
R2 Galo BlancoG. Blanco | L | 6-1 7-6(4) | ||
T. Nurminen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 IPP Open - Helsinki - 14-11-2005 | ||||
Q1  Julian ReisterJ. Reister | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Nokian Hakkapeliitta Open - Tampere - 19-07-2004 | ||||
Q2  Nikos RovasN. Rovas | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 Niklas BuchtN. Bucht | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| IPP Open - Helsinki - 10-11-2003 | ||||
Q1 Juho PaukkuJ. Paukku | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q2  Boris PashanskiB. Pashanski | L | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | ||
M. Chmela vs T. Nurminen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.94% (9/8) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.30% (42/55) |
| 48.72% (19/20) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.79% (102/116) |
| 49.72% (180/182) | Games Win/Loss | 49.37% (1019/1045) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.14% (33/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (6/10) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 246.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.9 |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Challenger W/L | 45.35% (39/47) |
| 50% (8/16) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (41/96) |
| 33% (2/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (17/32) |
| 67% (4/6) | Deciding Set Win % | 24% (6/25) |
| 75% (8/6) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 74% (53/39) |
| 13% (8/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 26% (53/14) |
| 22% (9/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (44/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
D. GlinkaT. GentzschW1
1.58
W2
2.2
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
S. NapolitanoPRO. Virtanen3W1
3.84
W2
1.21
03:15 AM 19/11/25
Prediction
E. CamachoWCA. G. Meza4W1
8.6
W2
1.029
12:00 PM 19/11/25
PredictionR. MollekerP. O. FellinW1
1.52
W2
2.33
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
B. ZhukayevM. TopoW1
1.84
W2
1.84
12:00 PM 19/11/25
PredictionM. Lajal7
A. VatutinLLW1
1.33
W2
2.98
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Stefano NapolitanoOtto Virtanen12:00
H2H 0-0
Beibit ZhukayevMarko Topo12:00
H2H 0-0
Mark LajalAlexey Vatutin12:00
H2H 0-0
