Michael Vrbensky vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 05:10 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Vrbensky vs M. Imamura

 CZE
0
Win
Played
1
Win

 JPN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Vrbensky 0 - 1 Imamura
They have played 2 sets in total, with Michael Vrbensky winning 0 and Masamichi Imamura winning 2. The last match between Masamichi Imamura and Michael Vrbensky was at the Seoul Challenger, 27-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 6-4 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Vrbensky | 0 | 
| Imamura | 1 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Seoul Challenger(10-27-25)
M. Vrbensky vs M. Imamura H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,200 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 59.30% (306-210) | Career Total W/L | 57.75% (164-120) | 
| 0 | Hard | 1 | 
| 11 | Titles | 1 | 
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
M. Vrbensky vs M. Imamura Match Preview:
- Second Serve Superiority: Recently, Masamichi Imamura has excelled in winning points on his second serve, with a success rate of 43.73%, surpassing Michael Vrbensky's 41.69%. Is this slight advantage significant when predicting a winner? Potentially, yes.
- Return Game Insights: Vrbensky has shown strength in return games, claiming 48.71% of opponents' second-serve points compared to Imamura's 44.17%. For first-serve returns, Vrbensky leads with 27.76% over Imamura's 27.30%. Could this give Vrbensky an edge? Very likely.
- Composure Under Pressure: Vrbensky marginally outperforms Imamura in break-point saves, with a rate of 52.50% against 51.69%. Does this suggest Vrbensky performs better under pressure? Indeed, it might.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, both players have similar match win rates, Imamura with 42.11% and Vrbensky closely at 42.86%. Who has the general edge? It's almost even.
- Surface Preferences: Imamura thrives on Indoor Hard with a 67% win rate, but dips on Clay at 43%. Vrbensky prefers Clay with a 67% win rate but is weaker on Indoor Hard, winning 53%. Does surface matter? For these players, undeniably so.
- Player Experience Levels: Both players frequently compete at the Challengers/ITF level. Imamura has a 37.84% win rate there, and Vrbensky slightly better at 39.39%. Is Vrbensky better at lower-level events? Just slightly.
- Opponent Quality: Imamura generally faces higher-ranked opponents, average rank 388.14, compared to Vrbensky's 411.37. Does this mean Imamura has tougher matches? Yes, it tends to.
- Deciding Set Performance: When matches extend to a deciding set, Imamura's 50% win rate starkly outshines Vrbensky’s 11%. Does this suggest Imamura handles long matches better? Most definitely.
- Additional Considerations: Form during current events can sway predictions. Up-to-date performance data should also be considered for a comprehensive pick.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating Masamichi Imamura and Michael Vrbensky’s recent form, certain patterns emerge that shape our prediction for their upcoming match.
Imamura has demonstrated a slightly superior second serve performance, which might be pivotal. However, Vrbensky appears to have a strong edge in return games, potentially posing a threat to Imamura's service games.
When it comes to handling pressure, Vrbensky's marginal lead in saving breakpoints may provide him with the critical points necessary for victory.
As they step onto the clay court, Vrbensky’s higher win rate on this surface becomes crucial, supporting his relative edge over Imamura.
Despite Imamura's prowess in deciding set scenarios, which might come into play for game longevity, Vrbensky's advantages appear to outweigh Imamura's under current conditions.
Hence, considering all the facts and recent performance trends, Michael Vrbensky seems more likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Michael Vrbensky vs Masamichi Imamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Vrbensky vs M. Imamura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 | 
| 10 | Games Won | 13 | 
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 | 
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 | 
| 1:38:11 | Average Match Time | 1:38:11 | 
| 66% (48/73) | 1st Serve % | 72% (51/71) | 
| 56% (27/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (32/51) | 
| 52% (13/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (13/20) | 
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) | 
| 37% (26/71) | Return Points Win % | 45% (33/73) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
M. Vrbensky Recent Matches Played
M. Imamura Recent Matches Played

M. Vrbensky vs M. Imamura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.30% (306/210) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.75% (164/120) | 
| 57.13% (673/505) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.19% (362/271) | 
| 52.54% (5873/5306) | Games Win/Loss | 53.20% (3143/2765) | 
| 56.45% (35/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.24% (152/109) | 
| 61.37% (224/141) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) | 
| 52.81% (47/42) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (6/3) | 
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 | 
| 1677 | Aces Total | 436 | 
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 | 
| 1686 | Total Double Faults | 316 | 
| 1:41:3 | Average Match Time | 1:10:44 | 
| 494.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 455.07 | 
| 56% (19244/34660) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8891/13591) | 
| 69% (13341/19244) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5816/8891) | 
| 50% (7691/15415) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2326/4700) | 
| 45% (1569/3505) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (660/1472) | 
| 41% (14141/34429) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5797/13957) | 
| 50.00% (2/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 46.84% (89/101) | Challenger W/L | 41.38% (24/34) | 
| 66.77% (215/107) | Futures W/L | 61.95% (140/86) | 
| 59% (297/502) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (163/282) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 57% (83/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (31/58) | 
| 56% (88/156) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (31/65) | 
| 87% (306/265) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (168/150) | 
| 13% (306/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (168/18) | 
| 19% (210/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (116/14) | 












