Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Russell vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Russell vs Gimeno-Traver analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Russell vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Russell has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Russell, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Russell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Russell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gimeno-Traver winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Russell has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 91/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 22/ 28). Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Russell winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Russell winning 5 and Gimeno-Traver winning 3. The last match between Russell and Gimeno-Traver was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 08-04-2014, First, Clay with Michael Russell getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Russell and Gimeno-Traver have played a deciding set 1 times, with Russell winning 1 times and Gimeno-Traver 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Russell winning 2, and Gimeno-Traver 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Russell has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gimeno-Traver has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Russell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Russell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Russell 2 - 1 Gimeno-Traver
Ret.
Rank
60
High
45
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
58% (552-404)
Career Total W/L
57% (625-479)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$689,357
Career Prize Money
$1,102,200
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Russell VS Gimeno-Traver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Michael Russell | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
| Games Won | 38 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 25 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:44 | 1:7:44 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (158/235) | 59% (148/252) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (111/158) | 74% (109/148) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (39/77) | 45% (47/104) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (8/16) | 44% (8/18) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (96/252) | 36% (85/235) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Russell VS Gimeno-Traver H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Michael Russell
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 2-6 7-5 6-1 |
Stats
Michael Russell
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(8) 3-0 ret. |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Michael Russell
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
13
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Russell | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Michael Russell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Rogerio Dutra Da Silva
Player
Michael Russell
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michael Russell
Player
Facundo Mena
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Russell
Player
Fernando Romboli
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Michael Russell
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Michael Russell
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurgen Melzer
Player
Michael Russell
74%
(
70 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
109)
7
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Russell
Player
Alexander Zverev
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Harrison
Player
Michael Russell
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Russell
Player
Tim Smyczek
60%
(
75 of
124)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
1
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
35%
(
17 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
7-5 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Russell Vs Gimeno-Traver Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
