Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Mmoh vs Liam Broady Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mmoh vs Broady analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Mmoh vs Liam Broady Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mmoh has won 47.19% of points on his second serve, while Broady has won 48.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mmoh, in recent form, has won 48.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broady has won 51.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.49% and 30.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mmoh has saved 62.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broady has saved 61.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mmoh has won 54.39% of matches played (W/L 31/ 26), with Broady winning 54.55% (W/L 30/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14). Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 249/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 32/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11), where as Broady has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mmoh winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mmoh winning 4 and Broady winning 0. The last match between Mmoh and Broady was at the Knoxville Challenger, 09-11-2019, Semifinals, I.hard with Michael Mmoh getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:23.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mmoh and Broady have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mmoh winning 0 times and Broady 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Mmoh winning 2, and Broady 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mmoh has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.46 while Broady has played against players with an average rank of 286.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mmoh has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broady has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mmoh has converted 41.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broady has converted 43.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mmoh 2 - 0 Broady
111
Rank
81
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
149
Rank
93
High
30
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
58% (286-206)
Career Total W/L
58% (470-343)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$1,164,400
Career Prize Money
$1,004,050
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Mmoh | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:23 | 1:32:23 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (100/129) | 67% (91/135) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (76/100) | 63% (57/91) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (15/29) | 52% (23/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (6/18) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (55/135) | 29% (38/129) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Michael Mmoh
Player
Liam Broady
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-1 7-6(2) |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Liam Broady
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Mmoh | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (19/22) | 55% (12/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (194/197) | 52% (101/93) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:8 | 1:34:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.84 | 207.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (809/1247) | 60% (373/619) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (580/809) | 71% (263/373) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (203/438) | 49% (121/246) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (43/96) | 41% (27/66) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (438/1207) | 40% (249/626) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve %
39%
(
7 of
18)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
19
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Liam Broady
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Pedro Cachin
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Aziz Dougaz
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mmoh Vs Broady Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
