Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Mmoh vs Gabriel Decamps Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mmoh vs Decamps analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Mmoh vs Gabriel Decamps Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mmoh has won 46.83% of points on his second serve, while Decamps has won 50.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mmoh, in recent form, has won 48.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Decamps has won 55.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.07% and 35.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mmoh has saved 62.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Decamps has saved 55.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mmoh has won 54.39% of matches played (W/L 31/ 26), with Decamps winning 64.15% (W/L 34/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14). Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11), where as Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.77% of matches (W/L 30/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mmoh winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mmoh winning 2 and Decamps winning 0. The last match between Mmoh and Decamps was at the Malaga Challenger, 28-06-2022, First, Hard with Michael Mmoh getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mmoh and Decamps have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mmoh winning 0 times and Decamps 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mmoh winning 0, and Decamps 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mmoh has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.46 while Decamps has played against players with an average rank of 210.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mmoh has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Decamps has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mmoh has converted 41.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Decamps has converted 44.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mmoh 1 - 0 Decamps
114
Rank
81
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
661
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
58% (286-206)
Career Total W/L
63% (161-93)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
69% (18-8)
$1,164,400
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Mmoh | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:50 | 1:38:50 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (44/64) | 60% (36/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (30/44) | 58% (21/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 30% (6/20) | 29% (7/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (32/60) | 44% (28/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Michael Mmoh
Player
Gabriel Decamps
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Mmoh | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 69% (18/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (19/22) | 68% (38/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (194/197) | 57% (298/226) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 74% (14/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 59 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 84 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:8 | 1:28:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.84 | 200 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (809/1247) | 63% (904/1444) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (580/809) | 68% (618/904) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (203/438) | 49% (267/540) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (43/96) | 46% (84/183) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (438/1207) | 44% (677/1547) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (17/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 71% (17/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 27% (11/3) |
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve %
39%
(
7 of
18)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
19
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Bancalari
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Thiago Cigarran
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
63 of
116)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Gabriel Decamps
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Mmoh Vs Decamps Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Michael Mmoh
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
