Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Merel Hoedt vs Michaela Haet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoedt vs Haet analysis and find out who is favored!
Merel Hoedt vs Michaela Haet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoedt has won 42.22% of points on his second serve, while Haet has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoedt, in recent form, has won 57.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Haet has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoedt has saved 53.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Haet has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoedt has won 60.94% of matches played (W/L 39/ 25), with Haet winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 103/ 79), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Haet has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 40/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoedt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17), where as Haet has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoedt winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hoedt winning 2 and Haet winning 0. The last match between Hoedt and Haet was at the W60 Canberra, 20-03-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Merel Hoedt getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoedt and Haet have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hoedt winning 0 times and Haet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoedt winning 0, and Haet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoedt has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.97 while Haet has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoedt has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Haet has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoedt has converted 51.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Haet has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hoedt 1 - 0 Haet
526
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
859
Rank
521
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
55% (160-131)
Career Total W/L
58% (42-30)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Michaela Haet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (37/57) | 61% (35/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (26/37) | 57% (20/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (5/16) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (30/57) | 33% (19/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Merel Hoedt
Player
Michaela Haet
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Merel Hoedt | Michaela Haet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (33/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (276/225) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.67 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 164 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 235.08 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1033/1575) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (640/1033) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (225/542) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (124/242) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (833/1699) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (14/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sina Herrmann
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
18
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tilde Stromquist
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Merel Hoedt
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Alexandra Vasilyeva
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enola Chiesa
Player
Merel Hoedt
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Michaela Haet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Bozovic
Player
Michaela Haet
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Mays
Player
Michaela Haet
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hiroko Kuwata
Player
Michaela Haet
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
84%
(
54 of
64)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Michaela Haet
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Michaela Haet
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Michaela Haet
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Haet
Player
Stefani Webb
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
55 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michaela Haet
Player
Elena Micic
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Michaela Haet
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hoedt Vs Haet Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
