Prediction of Meike Babel vs Rikki Gaddie Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Babel vs R. Gaddie

Meike Babel

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

267

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Rikki Gaddie

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

267

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Babel 1 - 0 Gaddie

They have played 2 sets in total, with Meike Babel winning 2 and Rikki Gaddie winning 0. The last match between Meike Babel and Rikki Gaddie was at the ITF Madeira, 28-10-1991, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Meike Babel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Babel	1
Gaddie	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) ITF Madeira(10-28-91)

Stats

Meike Babel

Rikki Gaddie

M. Babel vs R. Gaddie H2H Profile

M. Babel	Stats	R. Gaddie
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
53.85% (119-102)	Career Total W/L	40.83% (69-100)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Babel vs R. Gaddie Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Meike Babel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rikki Gaddie has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Meike Babel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rikki Gaddie has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Meike Babel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rikki Gaddie has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Meike Babel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Rikki Gaddie winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Meike Babel has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 56% (W/L 10/8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Rikki Gaddie has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 56% (W/L 4/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 12/23).
Player level: In the last year, Meike Babel has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Rikki Gaddie has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Meike Babel winning 1 times and Rikki Gaddie being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Meike Babel winning 2 and Rikki Gaddie winning 0.
The last match between Meike Babel and Rikki Gaddie was at the ITF Madeira, 28-10-1991, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Meike Babel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Meike Babel has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Rikki Gaddie has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Meike Babel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rikki Gaddie has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Meike Babel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rikki Gaddie has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Meike Babel vs Rikki Gaddie Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Babel vs R. Gaddie H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Babel	Stats	R. Gaddie
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	2
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Babel Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Sparkassen Cup - Leipzig - 30-10-2000
Q1 Andrea GlassA. Glass	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
EuroTel Slovak Indoor 2000 - Bratislava - 23-10-2000
R1 Miriam OremansM. Oremans	L	6-0 6-0	Stats
Sanex Trophy - Knokke-Heist - 17-07-2000
R1 Dominique MonamiD. Monami	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
French Open - Paris - 29-05-2000
R1 Stephanie Cohen-AloroS. Cohen-Aloro	W	6-4 6-7(4) 6-1	Stats
R2 Emilie LoitE. Loit	L	6-4 6-1	Stats

View All

R. Gaddie Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Singapore - 18-04-1994
Q1 Petra RaclavskaP. Raclavska	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Pattaya - 11-04-1994
Q1 Anca BarnaA. Barna	L	7-6(5) 6-0	Stats
ITF Ramat Hasharon 2 - 29-11-1993
R4 Els CallensE. Callens	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
R3 Carin BakkumC. Bakkum	W	6-2 7-5	Stats
ITF Jakarta - 25-10-1993
R4 Tessa PriceT. Price	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Babel vs R. Gaddie Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Babel	Stats	R. Gaddie
53.85% (119/102)	YTD Win/Loss	40.83% (69/100)
52.94% (261/232)	Sets Win/Loss	42.33% (160/218)
51.21% (2241/2135)	Games Win/Loss	47.30% (1621/1806)
56.45% (35/27)	Hard Win/Loss	43.75% (49/63)
55.14% (59/48)	Clay Win/Loss	34.29% (12/23)
45.45% (15/18)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/3)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	36.36% (4/7)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
322.53	Average Opponent Rank	456.3
38.10% (8/13)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (3/3)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
33.33% (1/2)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
32.14% (9/19)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
76.19% (32/10)	Challenger W/L	41.18% (42/60)
55.56% (10/8)	Futures W/L	50.00% (4/4)
54% (113/210)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	40% (67/166)
67% (2/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
31% (4/13)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	40% (10/25)
54% (32/59)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (19/42)
87% (118/103)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (76/59)
13% (118/15)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	22% (76/17)
15% (100/15)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (92/10)