Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mayar Sherif vs Chloe Paquet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sherif vs Paquet analysis and find out who is favored!
Mayar Sherif vs Chloe Paquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sherif has won 49.71% of points on his second serve, while Paquet has won 45.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sherif, in recent form, has won 49.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paquet has won 56.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.01% and 40.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sherif has saved 55.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paquet has saved 50.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sherif has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 24/ 21), with Paquet winning 53.85% (W/L 42/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sherif has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 173/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 224/ 194), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Sherif has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 15/ 3), where as Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sherif winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Sherif winning 4 and Paquet winning 0. The last match between Sherif and Paquet was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat, 17-05-2022, First, Clay with Mayar Sherif getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sherif and Paquet have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sherif winning 0 times and Paquet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sherif winning 0, and Paquet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sherif has played against opponents with an average rank of 150.62 while Paquet has played against players with an average rank of 258.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sherif has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paquet has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sherif has converted 40.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paquet has converted 42.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sherif 2 - 0 Paquet
80
Rank
31
High
28
Age
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
133
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
65% (247-133)
Career Total W/L
52% (393-365)
42% (5-7)
YTD W/L
52% (14-13)
$822,323
Career Prize Money
$218,175
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mayar Sherif | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:30 | 1:26:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (71/103) | 49% (60/122) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (54/71) | 53% (32/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (18/32) | 47% (29/62) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (9/14) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (61/122) | 30% (31/103) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Mayar Sherif
Player
Chloe Paquet
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
14 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Chloe Paquet
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mayar Sherif | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (5/7) | 52% (14/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (12/17) | 52% (33/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (127/139) | 52% (296/275) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 63% (10/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 14 | 62 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 114 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:35 | 1:55:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 117.42 | 274.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (631/873) | 59% (1076/1821) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (375/631) | 62% (672/1076) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (118/242) | 45% (338/745) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (39/90) | 41% (119/291) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (376/899) | 47% (938/2016) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (5/12) | 52% (14/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 17% (1/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 29% (14/4) |
Mayar Sherif Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Mayar Sherif
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Ana Bogdan
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Mayar Sherif
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Marta Kostyuk
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Lauren Davis
77%
(
85 of
111)
1st Serve %
75%
(
90 of
120)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
50 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Mayar Sherif
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Mayar Sherif
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
115)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
58%
(
69 of
118)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
55 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Peyton Stearns
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Renata Zarazua
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Chloe Paquet
75%
(
78 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andreea Mitu
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Sherif Vs Paquet Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mayar Sherif
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
