M. Chazal
To Win
A. Reymond
To Win
Maxime Chazal vs Michael Gloeckler Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L W L W W
Form
W L W W L W W W L LHead To Head: Chazal 1 - 0 Gloeckler
They have played 3 sets in total, with Chazal winning 2 and Gloeckler winning 1. The last match between Chazal and Gloeckler was at the M15 Dubrovnik, 18-04-2024, Second, Clay with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maxime Chazal | 1 |
| Michael Gloeckler | 0 |
M15 Dubrovnik(18-04-2024)
3
6
6
3
6
2
| Chazal | Stats | Gloeckler |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (13-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (9-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 326 | Ranking | N/A |
| 234 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 32 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 0 |
| 60% (488-320) | Career Total W/L | 55% (132-107) |
| $2,860 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Maxime Chazal
Player
Michael Gloeckler
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
43 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:9:0 | Average Match Time | 2:9:0 |
| 69% (48/70) | 1st Serve % | 64% (42/66) |
| 90% (43/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (25/42) |
| 27% (6/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (16/24) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 38% (25/66) | Return Points Win % | 30% (21/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Raphael Vaksmann
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Marko Banicevic
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Maxime Chazal
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julio Cesar Porras
Player
Maxime Chazal
73%
(
77 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Parisca
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Maxime Chazal
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Maxime Chazal
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Gloeckler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Michael Gloeckler
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Gloeckler
Player
Sergey Petrov
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Essa Qabazard
Player
Michael Gloeckler
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
53%
(
30 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
12 of
45)
39
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 7-6(10) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Herman
Player
Michael Gloeckler
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Gloeckler
Player
William Mirarchi
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (488/320) | Win/Loss | 55% (132/107) |
| 58% (1072/770) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (300/241) |
| 54% (9159/7943) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2800/2541) |
| 43% (30/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (41/24) |
| 63% (450/263) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (69/55) |
| 31% (8/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (22/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1011 | Aces Total | 356 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1353 | Total Double Faults | 279 |
| 1:18:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 560.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 225.99 |
| 68% (26758/39592) | 1st Serve % | 64% (4544/7155) |
| 65% (17319/26758) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2995/4544) |
| 49% (6270/12833) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1230/2610) |
| 47% (2075/4456) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (242/574) |
| 43% (16588/38519) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2583/6959) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (62/85) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (424/224) | Futures W/L | 55% (132/107) |
| 61% (482/789) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (130/237) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (97/188) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (36/68) |
| 60% (144/241) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (26/63) |
| 88% (463/407) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (139/118) |
| 12% (463/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (139/21) |
| 24% (344/81) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (100/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
