Maxim Zhukov vs Yunseok Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Aug at 04:56 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Zhukov vs Y. Jang

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zhukov 1 - 0 Jang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Maxim Zhukov winning 2 and Yunseok Jang winning 0. The last match between Maxim Zhukov and Yunseok Jang was at the M15 Maanshan, 21-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Maxim Zhukov getting the victory 6-4 7-6(8).
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Zhukov | 1 |
Jang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Maanshan(08-21-25)
M. Zhukov vs Y. Jang H2H Profile
M. Zhukov vs Y. Jang Match Preview:
- Zhukov outperforms Jang on second serve points, winning 41.78% compared to Jang's 37.82%. Does this make Zhukov a more reliable server? It appears so, which might give Zhukov an edge.
- Jang has won 44.94% of return points on their opponent's second serve, while Zhukov has a slightly higher figure of 49.12%. Will Zhukov's stronger returning game prove decisive? It is a possibility.
- In first serve returns, Zhukov leads with 28.92% over Jang's 28.06%. Minimal difference, but still indicative of Zhukov's slight advantage in returns.
- Zhukov excels under pressure, saving 50.19% of breakpoints, compared to Jang's 33.33%. Could this stat be crucial during high-tension moments? Likely, yes.
- Over the past year, Jang has a better match win rate at 57.14% versus Zhukov's 52.54%. Is Jang more consistent overall? Their win rate suggests so.
- In terms of surface preference, Jang performs best on indoor hard courts (56%), while Zhukov shines on regular hard courts (57%). How does surface influence match outcomes? It can be pivotal given each player's preferences.
- When playing in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, Jang has won slightly more matches at 57.14% compared to Zhukov's 55.56%. Is Jang thus more experienced at this level?
- Jang has faced tougher opponents (average rank 267.8) compared to Zhukov (average rank 380.85), suggesting Jang might be more battle-hardened.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Zhukov has a higher success rate, winning 39% of such situations versus Jang's 25%. Will Jang struggle if the match extends? History suggests the possibility.
- Zhukov is also more effective in break point conversion, with a rate of 36.67% compared to Jang's 30.3%, which could be vital during crucial moments.
Editorial Prediction (August 20, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance trends and statistics, Zhukov demonstrates a slight edge in several key areas, particularly in second serve points, return games, and pressure management. These components are often indicative of match success.
Despite Jang's overall better match win rate in the past year, Zhukov's ability to perform under pressure and convert critical break points could swing the match in their favor.
Considering the statistics and their implications, Zhukov is more likely to emerge as the winner in the upcoming tennis match.
Maxim Zhukov vs Yunseok Jang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Zhukov vs Y. Jang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:11:45 | Average Match Time | 2:11:45 |
71% (58/82) | 1st Serve % | 45% (33/74) |
66% (38/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (20/33) |
50% (12/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (23/41) |
50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
42% (31/74) | Return Points Win % | 39% (32/82) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Zhukov Recent Matches Played
Y. Jang Recent Matches Played

M. Zhukov vs Y. Jang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57.69% (135/99) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.27% (89/75) |
56.77% (302/230) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.22% (199/168) |
53.10% (2615/2310) | Games Win/Loss | 52.14% (1743/1600) |
57.04% (77/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.00% (77/63) |
55.13% (43/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
71.43% (15/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.38% (11/10) |
0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
369 | Aces Total | 155 |
0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
774 | Total Double Faults | 254 |
1:30:56 | Average Match Time | 1:2:42 |
360.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 329.59 |
62% (8374/13590) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4472/6856) |
63% (5306/8374) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2786/4472) |
47% (2476/5216) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1164/2384) |
45% (749/1661) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (329/715) |
44% (6068/13765) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2881/6935) |
0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (12/12) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
58.85% (123/86) | Futures W/L | 54.94% (89/73) |
57% (132/231) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (87/157) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
51% (22/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
48% (32/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (22/43) |
84% (136/114) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (92/80) |
15% (136/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (92/12) |
20% (98/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (71/9) |