Maxim Zhukov vs Daniel Tazabekov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance impact match outcomes? Zhukov is ahead, winning 42.53% of points on their second serve compared to Tazabekov's 36.36%.
• What about return game effectiveness? Tazabekov has a slight edge here, capturing 52.63% of opponents' second serve points, while Zhukov manages 48.63%.
• First serve return? Both players are similar, with Zhukov at 30.06% and Tazabekov slightly better at 30.77%.
• Under pressure, saving breakpoints is crucial. Here, Tazabekov excels with a 56% save rate compared to Zhukov's 51.25%.
• Overall match performance in the past year shows Zhukov slightly better, winning 51.67% of matches, whereas Tazabekov holds at 50%.
• Investigating surfaces, Zhukov's best success is on Hard surfaces, winning 57%, unlike Tazabekov, whose best surface is Clay at 50%.
• At the Futures/ITF level, Tazabekov dominates with a 66.67% win rate, surpassing Zhukov's 54.55%.
• Examining opponent quality reveals a notable difference; Zhukov faced opponents with an average rank of 398.95, while Tazabekov faced stronger competition, average rank 181.
• Deciding set performance is pivotal for live match predictions. Zhukov has won 45% of these, whereas Tazabekov remains undefeated.
• Lastly, in recent break point conversion, Zhukov is marginally better at 35.62%, compared to Tazabekov’s 33.33%.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

Zhukov has demonstrated superior performance on key stats such as second serve success and break point conversion, suggesting strength in vital areas of play. Meanwhile, Tazabekov's edge in return games and breakpoint saves can't be overlooked, hinting at resilience under pressure.

Although both competitors match well in first serve return efficiency and overall yearly win rates, the anomaly lies in Tazabekov's exposure to highly ranked opponents, indicating potential experience advantage.

This matchup promises competitive exchanges, particularly if it ventures into a deciding set where Tazabekov has historically excelled.

Considering the statistical overview and past data, Zhukov appears marginally more equipped to secure a victory in this head-to-head clash.