Max Purcell vs Liam Broady Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Dec at 01:05 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Purcell vs L. Broady

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Purcell 1 - 0 Broady
They have played 2 sets in total, with Max Purcell winning 2 and Liam Broady winning 0. The last match between Max Purcell and Liam Broady was at the Indianapolis Challenger, 19-07-2022, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Max Purcell getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Purcell | 1 |
| Broady | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Indianapolis Challenger(07-19-22)
M. Purcell vs L. Broady H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,208,460 | Career Prize Money | $1,004,050 |
| 57.17% (287-215) | Career Total W/L | 58.78% (539-378) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Purcell vs L. Broady Match Preview:
- How do their second serve performances compare? Max Purcell has struggled recently, winning 0% of second serve points, while Liam Broady has achieved a 43.22% success rate. This gives Broady a significant edge.
- In terms of return games, Broady has been stronger, capturing 40.16% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Purcell's 0%.
- What about handling pressure? Broady excels at saving breakpoints, with a 50% success rate recently, unlike Purcell, who has not saved any in recent form.
- Looking at performance over the last year, Purcell has not registered any wins (0/0 record), whereas Broady boasts a 74.42% win rate with a 64/22 record.
- On their best surfaces, both excel on Hard courts with 59% career win rates, but Broady's weakness on Grass (36%) contrasts with Purcell's more balanced surface performance.
- Player level exposure reveals that Purcell has not competed in recorded events recently, while Broady has been active, winning 75.68% of matches in ITF tournaments.
- Broady leads in opponent quality stats, having faced competitors with an average rank of 390.2, whereas Purcell's rank statistics aren't available.
- What history do they share? Purcell leads their head-to-head, having won their sole encounter convincingly in 2022, which was on an indoor hard surface (6-2, 6-2).
- If this match extends to a deciding set, Broady is more reliable, with a 59% success rate recently, while Purcell has yet to win a deciding set in the past year.
Editorial Prediction (December 23, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the recent stats and performances of both players suggests distinct advantages for Liam Broady. He has demonstrated superior form in key aspects of the game, including second serve points and return statistics, which often determine match outcomes.
Additionally, Broady's ability to perform under pressure, as evidenced by his 50% breakpoint save rate, further sets him ahead of Purcell, who has struggled in this area. Despite Purcell's past victory in their sole meeting, Broady's consistent performance over the last year indicates significant improvement in form and competitive experience.
With Broady's readiness to tackle tougher opponents, reflected by his engagements against players ranked around 390.2, his level of competition has been more rigorous compared to Purcell, who lacks recent competitive activities.
Considering these factors, Liam Broady is favored to win the upcoming match against Max Purcell.
Max Purcell vs Liam Broady Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Purcell vs L. Broady H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:9:0 | Average Match Time | 1:9:0 |
| 63% (26/41) | 1st Serve % | 58% (33/57) |
| 92% (24/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 60% (9/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/3) |
| 51% (29/57) | Return Points Win % | 20% (8/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Purcell Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-0 1-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 7-6(1) | ||
Q1 | L | 4-6 7-6(9) 6-4 | ||
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | ||
QF | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
F | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||

M. Purcell vs L. Broady Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.17% (287/215) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.78% (539/378) |
| 54.59% (648/539) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.21% (1210/905) |
| 51.12% (5863/5606) | Games Win/Loss | 53.05% (10555/9342) |
| 58.71% (209/147) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.23% (282/164) |
| 53.70% (29/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.93% (78/64) |
| 51.06% (24/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.34% (146/92) |
| 55.56% (25/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 36.26% (33/58) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 3164 | Aces Total | 2497 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1013 | Total Double Faults | 1593 |
| 1:33:52 | Average Match Time | 1:14:30 |
| 465.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 515.85 |
| 59% (20309/34498) | 1st Serve % | 63% (30622/48681) |
| 72% (14718/20309) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (20924/30622) |
| 51% (7170/14188) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (9446/18052) |
| 40% (1272/3220) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2068/4798) |
| 38% (13496/35605) | Return Points Win % | 40% (19260/48313) |
| 43.59% (17/22) | Slam W/L | 47.27% (26/29) |
| 43.48% (10/13) | Masters W/L | 56.25% (9/7) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 43.82% (39/50) | Main Tour W/L | 45.98% (40/47) |
| 60.38% (157/103) | Challenger W/L | 56.01% (233/183) |
| 73.26% (63/23) | Futures W/L | 67.55% (229/110) |
| 58% (278/480) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (527/888) |
| 31% (5/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 56% (112/200) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (140/276) |
| 59% (96/164) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (142/270) |
| 86% (270/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (528/462) |
| 14% (270/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (528/65) |
| 23% (231/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (386/76) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Blockx H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
