Max Purcell vs Clement Tabur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Purcell vs Tabur analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Purcell vs Clement Tabur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Purcell has won 50.23% of points on his second serve, while Tabur has won 47.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Purcell, in recent form, has won 45.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tabur has won 54.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.14% and 35.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Purcell has saved 60.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tabur has saved 58.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Purcell has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 28/ 32), with Tabur winning 70.11% (W/L 61/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 202/ 139), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34).
- Player level: In the last year, Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 9/ 18), where as Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.64% of matches (W/L 46/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Purcell winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Purcell winning 0 and Tabur winning 2. The last match between Purcell and Tabur was at the Prague 2 Challenger, 03-05-2022, First, Clay with Clement Tabur getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Purcell and Tabur have played a deciding set 0 times, with Purcell winning 0 times and Tabur 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Purcell winning 0, and Tabur 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Purcell has played against opponents with an average rank of 194.55 while Tabur has played against players with an average rank of 263.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Purcell has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tabur has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Purcell has converted 29.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tabur has converted 38.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Purcell 0 - 1 Tabur
9
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
80
Rank
40
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
204
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
9
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
57% (271-201)
Career Total W/L
61% (239-154)
33% (5-10)
YTD W/L
48% (11-12)
$905,950
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Max Purcell | Clement Tabur |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 7 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:39:48 | 1:39:48 |
1st Serve % | 53% (29/55) | 44% (37/85) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 73% (27/37) |
2nd Serve Win% | 42% (11/26) | 54% (26/48) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 9% (1/11) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Points W% | 38% (32/85) | 42% (23/55) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Max Purcell
44%
(
37 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Max Purcell | Clement Tabur |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (5/10) | 48% (11/12) |
Sets Win/Loss | 38% (15/25) | 46% (23/27) |
Games Win/Loss | 44% (173/219) | 51% (240/231) |
Hard Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) | 0% (0/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 55% (11/9) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.61 | 0.28 |
Aces Total | 118 | 64 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.35 |
DFs Total | 46 | 80 |
Avg Match Time | 1:51:34 | 1:46:44 |
Avg Opp Rank | 147.53 | 259.35 |
1st Serve % | 56% (674/1197) | 62% (944/1532) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (489/674) | 68% (640/944) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (270/523) | 47% (277/588) |
BPs Won% Total | 27% (24/88) | 36% (65/183) |
Return Pts W% | 32% (372/1164) | 41% (644/1556) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 31% (4/13) | 48% (11/23) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 29% (2/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 100% (9/9) |
1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 0% (9/0) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 14% (14/2) |
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Alex Michelsen
42%
(
44 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
82 of
119)
8
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
54 of
82)
61%
(
37 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Max Purcell
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
4
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nuno Borges
Player
Max Purcell
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
53%
(
55 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Max Purcell
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marcos Giron
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
3
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
14
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yibing Wu
Player
Clement Tabur
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Clement Tabur
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
4 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Clement Tabur
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
15%
(
3 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Clement Tabur
Player
Hernan Casanova
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more