Matyas Cerny vs Dennis Novak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 09:58 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Cerny vs D. Novak

 CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cerny 1 - 0 Novak
They have played 3 sets in total, with Matyas Cerny winning 2 and Dennis Novak winning 1. The last match between Matyas Cerny and Dennis Novak was at the M25 Ceska Lipa, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Matyas Cerny getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Cerny | 1 | 
| Novak | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Ceska Lipa(06-11-25)
M. Cerny vs D. Novak H2H Profile
M. Cerny vs D. Novak Match Preview:
- How does Novak perform on second serves compared to Cerny? Novak has a higher success rate, winning 44.16% of points on second serves, while Cerny wins 39.7%, indicating an advantage for Novak in this area.
- Are there differences in return game performance? In recent form, Novak wins 48% of opponent's second serve points, closely matched by Cerny's 48.6%. Conversely, Cerny leads slightly with first serve returns at 30.39% over Novak's 27.54%.
- Under pressure, how do they handle breakpoints? Novak saves 55.78% of breakpoints compared to Cerny's 50%, suggesting Novak is more resilient.
- What is their overall performance overview in the past year? Novak has a better win record at 55.1% compared to Cerny's 36.36%, pointing to Novak's superior recent form.
- On which surfaces do they excel? Novak is stronger on Hard courts with a 68% win rate, whereas Cerny struggles on this surface, having won no matches.
- Considering the event level, how do they differ? Novak competes at a higher level, winning 56.67% of matches in Challengers/ITF $10K level, compared to Cerny's 38.71% in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K.
- What about opponent quality? Novak has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 399.61, while Cerny's opponents average 413.45.
- In terms of deciding sets, how do they perform? Novak has a substantial advantage, winning 53% of deciding sets, whereas Cerny has not won any.
- How do they fare in breakpoint conversions? Both convert similar portions of their chances, with Cerny at 31.71% and Novak at 31.11%.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent stats, Novak demonstrates a significant edge over Cerny in multiple areas. His superior win rate on second serves and ability to save more breakpoints under pressure illustrate strong on-court resilience.
Novak's match history on Hard surfaces further solidifies his position, particularly given Cerny's struggles on this surface. The quality of Novak's opponents suggests he's consistently faced more challenging competition, building competitive prowess.
In deciding sets, Novak's success rate is a critical factor, pointing towards mental stamina and finishing capabilities. This, coupled with his experience at a higher tournament level, enhances his edge.
All these factors considered, Novak is the likely favorite to win the upcoming match against Cerny, given his overall more robust and consistent performance patterns.
Matyas Cerny vs Dennis Novak Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Cerny vs D. Novak H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 | 
| 14 | Games Won | 13 | 
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 | 
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 | 
| 1:59:33 | Average Match Time | 1:59:33 | 
| 44% (31/71) | 1st Serve % | 64% (58/90) | 
| 71% (22/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (37/58) | 
| 55% (22/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) | 
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) | 
| 43% (39/90) | Return Points Win % | 38% (27/71) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
M. Cerny Recent Matches Played
D. Novak Recent Matches Played

M. Cerny vs D. Novak Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.61% (80/75) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.84% (530/327) | 
| 52.98% (178/158) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.57% (1195/811) | 
| 52.13% (1569/1441) | Games Win/Loss | 53.26% (10072/8838) | 
| 12.50% (1/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.80% (120/57) | 
| 55.56% (70/56) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.05% (291/178) | 
| 42.86% (9/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.12% (92/78) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 65.85% (27/14) | 
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 | 
| 110 | Aces Total | 2444 | 
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 | 
| 206 | Total Double Faults | 1713 | 
| 1:6:23 | Average Match Time | 1:9:48 | 
| 354.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 523.96 | 
| 62% (3973/6389) | 1st Serve % | 65% (29394/45490) | 
| 62% (2477/3973) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (20153/29394) | 
| 48% (1152/2416) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8054/16095) | 
| 44% (321/726) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1980/4700) | 
| 42% (2684/6380) | Return Points Win % | 40% (18502/46161) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 58.62% (34/24) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (11/11) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 45.98% (40/47) | 
| 38.46% (5/8) | Challenger W/L | 53.98% (190/162) | 
| 52.82% (75/67) | Futures W/L | 75.60% (254/82) | 
| 52% (78/150) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (514/823) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (12/26) | 
| 32% (10/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (158/284) | 
| 35% (11/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (138/261) | 
| 89% (83/74) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (517/446) | 
| 11% (83/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (517/70) | 
| 8% (72/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (340/83) | 












