Matthew Hulme vs Arman Zamani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Hulme has demonstrated superior second serve performance, winning 49.66% of points compared to Zamani's 28.57%. Could this provide Hulme with a competitive edge in the match?
• Return Game Stats: Hulme's ability to win points on an opponent's second serve is slightly higher at 38.59% compared to Zamani's 33.33%. Intriguingly, Zamani outperforms Hulme in returning first serves, with a success rate of 37.5% against Hulme's 26.65%. Will Zamani's first serve return capability pose a threat to Hulme?
• Under Pressure Analysis: Hulme shows resilience under pressure by saving 58.39% of breakpoints, significantly higher than Zamani's 40% breakpoint save rate. How might this resilience impact the outcome in tense moments?
• Performance Overview: Throughout the past year, Zamani has a superior match win rate of 57.14%, compared to Hulme's 40.63%. Will this overall better performance translate to a victory in this matchup?
• Best Surface: Hulme excels on hard courts with a win rate of 51%, whereas Zamani performs best on indoor hard courts with 50% wins. Will the surface play a crucial role in deciding the winner?
• Player Level: Hulme has participated mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K with a win percentage of 33.33%, while Zamani's win rate at the same level is 57.14%. How significant is the experience at this level in predicting the match outcome?
• Opponent Quality: Hulme has faced opponents with an average rank of 355.19 over the past year, unlike Zamani, who faced unranked opposition. Does this variation in opponent caliber influence the prediction?
• Deciding Set Performance: Should the match reach a deciding set, Zamani holds a perfect 100% win rate in such situations, whereas Hulme has only managed 33%. Does this suggest Zamani has an upper hand in high-pressure scenarios?
• Break Point Conversion: Zamani has been very effective at converting break points, succeeding 66.67% of the time, compared to Hulme's 27.08%. Could this decisive factor turn the tide in Zamani's favor?

Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the key statistics reveals a potential edge for Zamani, who exhibits stronger performance in high-pressure moments and crucial aspects of the return game. Zamani's impressive breakpoint conversion and record in deciding sets could prove decisive.

While Hulme shows superiority in second serve effectiveness and pressure resilience, Zamani's overall stronger match performance and ability to convert crucial points make them a formidable opponent.

Based on the evidence gathered from these statistics, Zamani is slightly favored to secure a victory in the upcoming match.