Matteo Viola vs Javier Barranco Cosano Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W L W L L
Form
W L W L L L W L W LH2H: Viola 0 - 1 Cosano
They have played 3 sets in total, with Viola winning 1 and Cosano winning 2. The last match between Viola and Cosano was at the Croatia F1 (Rovinj), 10-03-2018, Quarterfinals, Clay with Javier Barranco Cosano getting the victory 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Matteo Viola | 0 |
| Javier Barranco Cosano | 1 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Stats 
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Matteo Viola
70%
(
77 of
110)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
49%
(
54 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 14 | Games Won | 17 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:45:0 | Average Match Time | 2:45:0 |
| 68% (74/109) | 1st Serve % | 70% (77/110) |
| 49% (36/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (44/77) |
| 46% (16/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (12/33) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
| 49% (54/110) | Return Points Win % | 52% (57/109) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Matteo Viola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Pavel Nejedly
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Matteo Viola
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Matteo Viola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Matteo Viola
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
11
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Matteo Viola
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Javier Barranco Cosano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
John Echeverria
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Klizan
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
31
Total Points Won
27
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (563/490) | Win/Loss | 60% (354/233) |
| 53% (1293/1169) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (785/565) |
| 51% (11695/11015) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6683/5854) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1006 | Aces Total | 945 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2685 | Total Double Faults | 1463 |
| 1:1:45 | Average Match Time | 1:33:47 |
| 568.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 269.96 |
| 66% (32316/49106) | 1st Serve % | 65% (23421/35963) |
| 63% (20444/32316) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (14954/23421) |
| 46% (7794/16790) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6058/12542) |
| 45% (2453/5479) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1927/4230) |
| 43% (20688/48079) | Return Points Win % | 44% (15911/36510) |
| 53% (554/1036) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (343/571) |
| 33% (3/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 51% (138/268) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (81/145) |
| 52% (186/355) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (99/184) |
| 83% (539/450) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (342/298) |
| 16% (539/88) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (342/44) |
| 22% (514/112) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (245/55) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
