Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matt Seeberger vs Greg Jones Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seeberger vs Jones analysis and find out who is favored!
Matt Seeberger vs Greg Jones Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seeberger has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jones has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seeberger, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jones has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seeberger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jones has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seeberger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jones winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seeberger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11). Jones has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 14/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seeberger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Seeberger winning 2 and Jones winning 0. The last match between Seeberger and Jones was at the Canada F4, 29-06-2015, First, Hard with Matt Seeberger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seeberger and Jones have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seeberger winning 0 times and Jones 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seeberger winning 0, and Jones 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seeberger has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jones has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seeberger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jones has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seeberger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jones has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Seeberger 1 - 0 Jones
Ret.
Rank
High
39
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
35
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
46% (45-52)
Career Total W/L
55% (293-244)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$50,600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matt Seeberger | Greg Jones |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matt Seeberger | Greg Jones |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matt Seeberger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Diego Matos
Player
Matt Seeberger
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
12 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Skyler Butts
Player
Matt Seeberger
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
Player
Matt Seeberger
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matt Seeberger
Player
Niklas Johansson
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
11
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roey Tabet
Player
Matt Seeberger
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matt Seeberger
Player
Alexander Abou Boutros
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sabit Suntic
Player
Matt Seeberger
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
38%
(
28 of
74)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Greg Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Babanine
Player
Greg Jones
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
92)
6
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
38 of
44)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Greg Jones
55%
(
56 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
85 of
118)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
85)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexander Ward
Player
Greg Jones
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greg Jones
Player
Lucas Gomez
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
21
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Greg Jones
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Greg Jones
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greg Jones
Player
Nick Chappell
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Conor Berg
Player
Greg Jones
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
8
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
56 of
77)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
120)
114
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(1) 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Lamble
Player
Greg Jones
44%
(
35 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Greg Jones
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Seeberger Vs Jones Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
