Mateus Alves vs Florian Broska Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 09 Jul at 09:35 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

M. Alves vs F. Broska

Mateus Alves
Mateus Alves

Flag BRA BRA

l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
Florian Broska
Florian Broska

Flag GER GER

w
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

24
Age
27
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
476
C. Rank
497
271
Best Rank
484
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Alves 1 - 0 Broska

They have played 3 sets in total, with Mateus Alves winning 2 and Florian Broska winning 1. The last match between Mateus Alves and Florian Broska was at the M25+H Kassel, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(6) 1-6 6-1.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Alves1
Broska0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1M25+H Kassel(07-09-25)

Clay
BRA Flag
Mateus Alves
7
1
6
GER Flag
Florian Broska
6
6
1

M. Alves vs F. Broska H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
57.25% (237-177)Career Total W/L61.34% (165-104)
1Clay0
6Titles3
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

M. Alves vs F. Broska Match Preview:

  • How recently have the players performed on their second serves? Alves has the edge with a 47.26% win rate, slightly higher than Broska's 46.36%.
  • In returning second serves, Alves also excels, winning 45.83% of these points compared to Broska's 44.32%.
  • When it comes to returning first serves, Broska has a slight advantage, achieving a 25.83% success rate versus Alves at 24.91%.
  • Under pressure, specifically in saving breakpoints, Broska has shown to be marginally better with a 59.11% save rate compared to Alves's 58.54%.
  • Looking at the overall match performance over the last year, Broska stands out with a 68.52% match win rate, whereas Alves holds a lower 50% win rate.
  • Both players excel on Hard courts, yet Broska leads with a 67% career win rate as opposed to Alves's 63% on the same surface.
  • Have they faced different levels of opposition? Yes, Alves has generally faced stronger opponents, with an average rank of 366.26 compared to Broska's 456.59.
  • In deciding sets, Broska proves to be more resilient, winning 59% in contrast to Alves's 41% success rate.
  • Regarding break point conversion, Broska shows efficiency, successfully converting 32.18% of opportunities, whereas Alves does so 30.13% of the time.

Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):

Looking at the second serve and return performance, Alves has demonstrated a slight superiority, indicating stronger baseline play which could prove decisive.

However, when the game intensifies during pressure moments, Broska's edge in both breakpoint saving and conversion rates suggests better mental fortitude.

The historical win rates and the surface preference on Hard courts put Broska in a stronger position, alongside superior deciding set statistics, which often determine the match outcome.

Given these factors, Broska is projected to have the upper hand in this upcoming encounter.

Mateus Alves vs Florian Broska Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Alves vs F. Broska H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won1
14Games Won13
8Aces (Total)6
0Total Double Faults3
2:23:21Average Match Time2:23:21
59% (51/87)1st Serve %66% (52/79)
71% (36/51)1st Serve Win %69% (36/52)
47% (17/36)2nd Serve Win %44% (12/27)
50% (4/8)Break Pts Won %67% (4/6)
39% (31/79)Return Points Win %39% (34/87)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Alves 51%, Broska 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Alves 49%, Broska 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Alves 63%, Broska 61%.

M. Alves Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayFlorianopolis Challenger - 17-11-2025

R2

BRAG. Heide
L
7-5 6-2

R1

KAZD. Popko
W
2-0 ret.
ClayM25 Santa Cruz do Sul - 03-11-2025

QF

BRAP. Boscardin
L
7-5 6-4

R2

MARY. Dlimi
W
3-6 6-3 6-4

R1

BRAV. Bini
W
6-1 6-0

F. Broska Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM25 Heraklion - 17-11-2025

R1

USAM. Jones
L
6-3 6-2
HardM15 Heraklion - 10-11-2025

R2

GREP. Tsitsipas
L
6-3 6-4

R1

USAM. Jones
W
3-6 6-3 6-1
I.hardHamburg Challenger - 20-10-2025

Q1

BELB. Gadamauri
L
7-6(5) 6-4
HardHersonissos 6 Challenger - 13-10-2025

Q1

NEDN. Visker
L
5-7 7-5 6-1
banner

M. Alves vs F. Broska Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
57.25% (237/177)YTD Win/Loss61.34% (165/104)
55.94% (537/423)Sets Win/Loss59.93% (365/244)
52.54% (4893/4420)Games Win/Loss54.14% (3071/2601)
61.87% (86/53)Hard Win/Loss63.33% (38/22)
54.91% (151/124)Clay Win/Loss61.22% (90/57)
0% (0/0)Indoor Hard W/L59.68% (37/25)
0.3Aces Per Game0.2
1358Aces Total551
0.13Double Faults Per Game0.17
612Total Double Faults479
1:5:45Average Match Time1:13:31
458.94Average Opponent Rank375.97
62% (10490/16930)1st Serve %60% (7830/12974)
73% (7631/10490)1st Serve Win %70% (5485/7830)
51% (3277/6440)2nd Serve Win %53% (2708/5144)
41% (589/1430)Break Points Won % (Total)40% (572/1428)
37% (6280/16807)Return Points Win %41% (5606/13836)
0.00% (0/6)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
50.58% (87/85)Challenger W/L39.13% (9/14)
63.56% (150/86)Futures W/L63.41% (156/90)
57% (233/407)Best of 3 Sets Win %61% (162/265)
50% (1/2)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
53% (79/150)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)54% (33/61)
53% (71/135)Deciding Set Win %49% (37/75)
89% (230/204)1st Set Won, Won Match90% (157/141)
11% (230/26)1st Set Won, Lost Match10% (157/16)
18% (184/33)1st Set Lost, Won Match21% (112/24)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sat, 22 Nov, 06:00 PM
Prediction
ARGA. Collarini8
BOLJ. C. P. Angelo5
W1
2.35
W2
1.51
Sat, 22 Nov, 04:00 PM
Prediction
SWEO. Wallin4
UKRG. Kravchenko
W1
1.69
W2
2.02
Sat, 22 Nov, 06:00 PM
Prediction
USAG. Johns1
GBRL. Maxted5
W1
1.49
W2
2.4
Sat, 22 Nov, 04:00 PM
Prediction
GBRA. Gray1
PORT. CacaoWC
W1
1.191
W2
4.05
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:00 PM
Prediction
CHID. A. Nunez3
MEXR. Alujas2
W1
1.58
W2
2.2
Sat, 22 Nov, 04:30 PM
Prediction
BRAD. D. D. Silva
BRAG. Heide
W1
3.4
W2
1.26