Mason Naumovski vs Chase Ferguson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Naumovski vs C. Ferguson

Mason Naumovski
AUS
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
26
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
696
0
Best Rank
692
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Chase Ferguson
AUS
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
26
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
696
0
Best Rank
692
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Naumovski 1 - 0 Ferguson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mason Naumovski winning 2 and Chase Ferguson winning 0. The last match between Mason Naumovski and Chase Ferguson was at the M25 Swan Hill, 20-03-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Mason Naumovski getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naumovski | 1 |
| Ferguson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Swan Hill(03-20-24)
Mason Naumovski
7
6
Chase Ferguson
6
4
M. Naumovski vs C. Ferguson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 45.60% (57-68) | Career Total W/L | 59.52% (100-68) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Naumovski vs C. Ferguson Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mason Naumovski has won 41.46% of points on their second serve, while Chase Ferguson has won 42.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mason Naumovski, in recent form, has won 40.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chase Ferguson has won 40.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.57% and 27.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mason Naumovski has saved 42.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chase Ferguson has saved 52.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mason Naumovski has won 28.57% of matches played (W/L 2/5), with Chase Ferguson winning 62.50% (W/L 35/21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mason Naumovski has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 7/13). Chase Ferguson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Mason Naumovski has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 2/5), where as Chase Ferguson has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.50% of matches (W/L 35/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mason Naumovski winning 1 times and Chase Ferguson being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mason Naumovski winning 2 and Chase Ferguson winning 0.
- The last match between Mason Naumovski and Chase Ferguson was at the M25 Swan Hill, 20-03-2024, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Mason Naumovski getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mason Naumovski has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.57 while Chase Ferguson has played against players with an average rank of 412.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mason Naumovski has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chase Ferguson has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mason Naumovski has converted 50.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chase Ferguson has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mason Naumovski vs Chase Ferguson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Naumovski vs C. Ferguson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:42:0 | Average Match Time | 1:42:0 |
| 56% (44/79) | 1st Serve % | 81% (56/69) |
| 86% (38/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (39/56) |
| 43% (15/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 35% (24/69) | Return Points Win % | 33% (26/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Naumovski 41%, Ferguson 53%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Naumovski 41%, Ferguson 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Naumovski 30%, Ferguson 62%.
M. Naumovski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(10) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 1-6 4-1 ret. | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 7-6(7) | ||
Q2 | W | 7-6(3) 6-1 | ||
C. Ferguson Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-7(5) 7-6(1) 6-1 | ||

M. Naumovski vs C. Ferguson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 45.60% (57/68) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.52% (100/68) |
| 46.40% (129/149) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.41% (217/161) |
| 48.51% (1320/1401) | Games Win/Loss | 53.93% (1880/1606) |
| 48.15% (39/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.59% (75/53) |
| 35.00% (7/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.00% (16/9) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 42.86% (9/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 198 | Aces Total | 199 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 182 | Total Double Faults | 188 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:15:48 |
| 221.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.9 |
| 62% (1638/2643) | 1st Serve % | 70% (5487/7823) |
| 67% (1105/1638) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3590/5487) |
| 42% (427/1005) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1219/2336) |
| 41% (82/202) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (364/832) |
| 36% (917/2531) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3270/7959) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.97% (57/67) | Futures W/L | 59.52% (100/68) |
| 45% (55/122) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (99/165) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 55% (16/29) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (19/38) |
| 45% (14/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (24/42) |
| 86% (58/50) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (95/88) |
| 14% (58/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (95/7) |
| 9% (67/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (73/11) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 21/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 21/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 21/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 21/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
03:00
H2H 0-0
03:15
H2H 0-0
04:00
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0