Masamichi Imamura vs Jurij Rodionov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Nov at 02:40 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Imamura vs J. Rodionov

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Imamura 1 - 0 Rodionov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Masamichi Imamura winning 2 and Jurij Rodionov winning 0. The last match between Masamichi Imamura and Jurij Rodionov was at the Taipei Challenger, 06-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Imamura | 1 |
| Rodionov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Taipei Challenger(11-06-25)
M. Imamura vs J. Rodionov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $530,915 |
| 57.64% (166-122) | Career Total W/L | 56.64% (320-245) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 75.00% (3-1) |
M. Imamura vs J. Rodionov Match Preview:
- In recent performance, Jurij Rodionov edges out Masamichi Imamura slightly in second serve points won, with percentages of 45.51% compared to 43.35%. Could this give Rodionov a serving advantage?
- Both players show similar success on first serve returns, but Rodionov again leads slightly with 45.90% of opponents' second serve points won versus Imamura’s 44.32%.
- When under pressure, Rodionov has saved 53.33% of breakpoints, narrowly outperforming Imamura who has saved 51.85%.
- Over the past year, Rodionov boasts a higher overall match win rate of 60.00%, contrasting with Imamura’s 43.86%. Does this suggest greater consistency from Rodionov?
- Both players prefer indoor hard surfaces, each winning 70% of matches there. However, Rodionov has more experience on this surface with a 110/66 record compared to Imamura's 7/3.
- In terms of tournament level, Rodionov has a stronger win percentage of 62.90% in Challenger/ITF tournaments, whereas Imamura's win percentage stands at 40.54%.
- Rodionov has faced higher-quality opponents with an average ranking of 232.27 compared to Imamura’s 407.47, indicating he might be better prepared for tougher matches.
- In deciding sets, Rodionov has a higher success rate, winning 67% compared to Imamura’s 50% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (November 6, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent performances and overall statistics, Jurij Rodionov appears to have a slight edge over Masamichi Imamura in almost all the comparative categories.
With better second serve effectiveness, superior breakpoint saving under pressure, and greater exposure to higher-ranked opponents, Rodionov demonstrates a more formidable presence on the court.
His consistent performance over the past year, coupled with a higher win rate in Challenger/ITF tournaments, suggests a readiness to capitalize on competitive opportunities.
Taking into account these strengths and comparing them to Imamura's areas of disadvantage, Jurij Rodionov is poised as the likely winner in the upcoming match.
Masamichi Imamura vs Jurij Rodionov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Imamura vs J. Rodionov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0:59:55 | Average Match Time | 0:59:55 |
| 53% (26/49) | 1st Serve % | 48% (22/46) |
| 77% (20/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (12/22) |
| 61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 100% (4/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
| 46% (21/46) | Return Points Win % | 31% (15/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Imamura Recent Matches Played
J. Rodionov Recent Matches Played

M. Imamura vs J. Rodionov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.64% (166/122) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.64% (320/245) |
| 57.23% (368/275) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.10% (746/608) |
| 53.27% (3195/2803) | Games Win/Loss | 51.35% (6715/6362) |
| 58.24% (152/109) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.76% (84/64) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.50% (109/91) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.38% (116/73) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 39.29% (11/17) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 450 | Aces Total | 2812 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 320 | Total Double Faults | 1478 |
| 1:11:8 | Average Match Time | 1:33:49 |
| 458.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 419.73 |
| 65% (9049/13853) | 1st Serve % | 61% (23874/39269) |
| 66% (5929/9049) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16826/23874) |
| 50% (2387/4804) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7622/15395) |
| 45% (675/1507) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1422/3457) |
| 42% (5931/14281) | Return Points Win % | 38% (14610/38816) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 41.43% (29/41) |
| 41.94% (26/36) | Challenger W/L | 59.89% (215/144) |
| 61.95% (140/86) | Futures W/L | 64.86% (48/26) |
| 58% (165/286) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (314/555) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 53% (31/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (116/210) |
| 46% (31/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (114/220) |
| 89% (171/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (310/257) |
| 11% (171/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (310/53) |
| 12% (117/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (255/62) |